13 London Road,
London, SE1 6JZ
020 7928 0276
info@lisaslaw.co.uk

News and Insights

You have likely seen on the news that the political and economic situation in Afghanistan remain in dire circumstances, with the Taliban in full control of the nation. There are reports of many people going without food, shelters being overly full and many businesses being unable to operate properly.

 

To show support to Afghanistan during this hard time, the UK has launched the Afghan Resettlement Scheme in order to bring people safely over here with the view of rehoming them and allowing them to integrate into our society. This blog will look at how concessions have been changed in order to allow Afghan nationals who either had entered the UK prior to 1 September 2021 or had made an entry clearance application prior to that date and subsequently arrive in the UK. These concessions also apply to their dependants.

 

Important criteria to be considered under the Afghan concessions

 

It is integral that applicants meet the below criteria to remain in the UK:

 

  • be an Afghan national, or their dependant partner or child

 

  • be in the UK lawfully or have been granted an exceptional assurance, or where the applicant has overstayed, paragraph 39E of the Immigration Rules must apply to them

 

  • prior to 1 September 2021 have lawfully entered the UK, or made an entry clearance application and subsequently arrived after that date in the UK using that entry clearance, as a:

 

  1. person on a work or study route set out in Table 1 (main applicants) or Table 2 (dependants) below (links to tables here),
  2. Visitor,
  3. T5 (Temporary Worker) Seasonal Worker/Temporary Work – Seasonal
  4. Worker,
  5. T5 (Temporary Worker) Youth Mobility Scheme/Youth Mobility Scheme,
  6. Short-term Student,
  7. Overseas Domestic Worker,
  8. Domestic Worker in a Private Household, or
  9. Domestic Worker who is a Victim of Modern Slavery

 

Or,

 

  • be applying for permission to stay on a work or study route

 

  • meet the requirements of the Immigration Rules for the route on which they are applying, subject to the concessions contained in this guidance.

 

It is important to remember that when an applicant does meet these criteria, it does not guarantee them a successful application. Each applicant will be considered individually on their own merits.

 

Switching routes

 

Some Afghan nationals may be permitted to stay in the UK under a different route to what they are currently on, otherwise known as ‘switching’. Usually, this will require the candidate to return to their home country in order to make such an application. As the situation in Afghanistan means that this is impossible or unadvisable for many people, some concessions have been brought in so that they can switch from inside the UK.

 

Such concessions will cover those who meet the general requirements above and also meet the following relevant requirements:

 

  • the applicant has confirmed in writing that they wish to be considered under this concession and has explained their reasons for applying in-country, rather than returning to Afghanistan to make an entry clearance application: the decision maker does not require detailed evidence as to why returning to Afghanistan would be problematic – they can instead be satisfied with a reasonable written explanation provided with the application.

 

 

  • they have entered the UK on a temporary route and are seeking permission to switch into a route listed in the tables below.

 

So, should an applicant meet the above criteria, they can apply to UK Visas and Immigration to switch from one route under the Immigration Rules to another. However, they must meet the requirements of the rules of that other route. All applications will be considered on a case by case basis, taking into account all of the circumstances.

 

 

Document flexibility

 

The Home Office will be reasonably flexible when dealing with applicants who cannot provide certain documentation needed for their application. However, this decision will be based on a written explanation from the applicant detailing why they cannot provide the document in question.

 

For example, the institution which distributes the document may not be operating in Afghanistan at this time. Or, the document must be collected in person, which again may not be possible or advised presently.

 

If the Home Office is satisfied that due to the situation in Afghanistan a document required by the Immigration Rules cannot reasonably be obtained from Afghanistan, the requirement to provide that document may be waived. Again, all applications will be considered on a case by case basis, taking into account all of the circumstances.

 

Our thoughts

                

We are pleased to see the UK take this positive stance on the situation in Afghanistan and have chosen to act in an empathetic and supportive way. People who find themselves in the UK after fleeing the situation in Afghanistan do not deserve to be punished for something that is not their fault, and it is a testament to the UK to provide them with needed support.

 

If you are reading this and have been affected by the situation in Afghanistan and require any legal advice, we are here for you.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

Or, download our free app! You can launch an enquiry, scan over documents, check progress on your case and much more!

 

Links to download below:

 

iPhone: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisas-law/id1503174541?ls=1

 

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lisaslaw 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

Written by Mahfuz Ahmed.

 

 

A person can apply for naturalisation and become a British Citizen if they satisfy all of the requirements. Some of those requirements include suitability requirements, eligibility requirements and passing the Life in the UK test.

 

Schedule 1, paragraph 1(2)(a) of the British Nationality Act 1981 states that any applicant must be in the United Kingdom for a period of 5 years prior to the date of the applicant (the five year rule).

 

The aim of the five-year rule is to ensure that an applicant for citizenship has a clear, strong connection with the UK evidenced by presence in the UK.

 

This means that an applicant can only be absent for a certain amount of days prior to the application to be eligible.

 

R (on the application of Vanriel and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

 

In this case the Claimant was born in Jamaica in 1956 and he came to the United Kingdom in 1962 with his mother.

 

In the 1990’s the Claimant would regularly visit his father and son in Jamaica using his Jamaican passport, which had an Indefinite Leave to Remain stamp.

 

In 2004, the Claimant attended his father’s funeral in Jamaica. When he sought to return in 2007 he was denied entry as a returning resident.

 

In 2018, the Claimant was granted a visa as a returning reside under the Windrush scheme. He applied for ILR which was granted. However, when applying for naturalisation he was refused in 2021 as he had not satisfied the five-year rule, that is to say he was not in the UK for 5 years prior to the application. The Secretary of State stated that they had no discretion to waive this requirement.

 

The Claimant challenged the refusal of his citizenship application by way of Judicial Review.

 

Judicial Review proceedings

 

The Claimant argued that they were victims of the type of injustice which had given rise to the Windrush scheme. They were wrongfully prevented to enter the United Kingdom despite having Indefinite Leave to Remain and therefore the 5 year rule could not be satisfied, through no fault of their own.

 

The Claimant argued that the five-year rule could not be justified as the criteria did not allow discretion, and therefore incompatible with the European Convention of Human Rights. There was indirect discrimination as the present rule did not permit the treatment of different situations to be assessed.

 

The Court agreed with the Claimant and held making citizenship decisions in the Claimants’ cases by application of the five-year rule with no discretion or flexibility was incompatible with their rights under art 14 in conjunction with art 8.

 

Our comments

 

This important decision is much welcome as discretion should be permitted when considering the 5 year rules. Applicant’s may have significant reasons as to why they cannot satisfy this requirement and now the Secretary of State would be obliged to consider those reasons.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/ 

 

Or, download our free app! You can launch an enquiry, scan over documents, check progress on your case and much more!

 

Links to download below:

 

iPhone: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisas-law/id1503174541?ls=1

 

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lisaslaw 

 

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

We are so pleased to welcome Nicklaus this week who joins us as a Paralegal! Already Nicklaus has shown himself to be a highly knowledgeable young man with a great work ethic. We are thrilled to have him at Lisa’s Law.

 

Nicklaus is an LLB Law graduate from the University of Leeds. He recently finished his Barrister Training Course with BPP University and was called to the Bar back in July 2021.

 

Nicklaus is interested in conveyancing, commercial and business law and has already gained valuable work experiences in those sectors through various internships and programs. He will be focusing mainly on conveyancing matters here at Lisa’s Law.

 

In his spare time, Nicklaus enjoys playing basketball and hiking.

 

Nicklaus is fluent in English, Mandarin, Malay and also has a working proficiency in Cantonese.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

Or, download our free app! You can launch an enquiry, scan over documents, check progress on your case and much more!

 

Links to download below:

 

iPhone: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisas-law/id1503174541?ls=1

 

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lisaslaw 

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

Sometimes the best way to figure out what is going on in the world of UK immigration is to take a look at the numbers related to it. We have analysed the data related to the sponsoring of applicants on the Tier 2, 4 and 5 routes. There are some interesting trends that reading this data reveals, and these findings will be the focus of this blog.

 

Firstly, what are Tier 2, 4 and 5 sponsors?

 

  • Tier 2 sponsors are employers of skilled workers.
  • Tier 4 sponsors are education providers (focussing on students).
  • Tier 5 sponsors are employees of temporary workers.

 

Number of registered Sponsors on Points Based System routes

 

Across each Tier, there has been a steady rise in the number of registered sponsors between Q4 of 2020 and Q3 of 2021. The largest increase has come in for the Tier 2 sponsors, with an additional 5,000 sponsors added within that time frame.

 

This is indicative of the fact that the Home Office is keen to bring in skilled workers from overseas, therefore incentivising them to allow for more firms to become sponsors of overseas workers. In fact, this is the largest increase of Tier 2 sponsors within such a time period since at least 2014.

 

Number of sponsor applications made

 

Keeping in line with the previous point, the largest number of sponsorship applications in recent months has been for the Tier 2 category, meaning that employers are very keen on getting workers from overseas into their businesses. This is a good thing for those looking to make a career in the UK, as opportunities seem to be on the rise for this kind of work.

 

Applications from Tier 4 and 5 sponsors, on the other hand, are slightly lower than usual but not by a significant amount. This shows that while there is still demand in these positions, uncertainties due to COVID-19 may have made education providers and employers of part time workers less sure about the future.

 

Length of time taken to process sponsorship applications

 

The length of time it takes to process applications has increased significantly, especially when looking back at the same data from 2014. Then, such applications for each Tier took under 4 weeks to complete in 80 – 90% of cases. In Q3 of 2021 this has only been the case in 18% of Tier 2 applications, 27% of Tier 4 applications and 23% of Tier 5 applications.

 

However, it is not necessary to look back that far to see that the length of time it takes to get applications completed is increasing. This creates backlogs of cases and other delays down the road.

 

One may look at this with an element of understanding when it comes to the Tier 2 applications, as there are now many more cases to deal with. However, the fact that applications for Tier 4 and 5 sponsorships have decreased should mean there is more time to get these completed.

 

 

Action against sponsors

 

There is an interesting trend that we can identify here. Action against sponsors, in this data, relates to the suspension or revocation of the sponsors licence. From 2013 to 2018 there was a slight decrease in this happening, with the exception of 2017 where revocations of Tier 2 sponsors experienced a spike.

 

If we turn our attention to the beginning and middle of 2020, when COVID-19 was causing major disruptions, we can see that the Home Office was still taking action against sponsors. They were not deterred by the pandemic very much at all.

 

However, looking at the data from 2021 we can see that hardly any action has been taken against sponsors. This means that they are being far more lenient than before. We presume this is because, after the effects of the pandemic, it is of vital importance to get the economy back up and running, and to do this they must encourage employers to bring in the workers they need to provide services and perform roles that will keep the wheels of society turning, and the money flowing in.

 

It is easy to criticise the government over this difficult period, but we wonder if the government had taken this stance earlier and not revoked so many sponsorships at the height of coronavirus, it may have worked out better for everyone.

 

Announcements on future visas

 

There have been some announcements recently regarding plans to bring in new visas for skilled workers. For example, care workers have been added to the Shortage Occupation List and are eligible for the Care Worker visa. Likewise, Sadiq Khan has announced that he wants to bring in a Temporary Construction Worker visa to help build up the capital, and build more affordable housing. This may result in more sponsorships being allocated to employers in these related fields.

 

Our thoughts

 

We are pleased to see that new visa types may be on the horizon, as more skilled workers coming to the UK means growth and prosperity for the nation, but also those who come here to work and make a life for themselves. This data holds some valuable information, and as far as we can see the coming months may look good for international workers coming to work.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

Or, download our free app! You can launch an enquiry, scan over documents, check progress on your case and much more!

 

Links to download below:

 

iPhone: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisas-law/id1503174541?ls=1

 

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lisaslaw 

 

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

We focus on a case today which is just one of many pending cases which have been stagnating since before Brexit, and are potentially affected by alterations of rules due to the UK leaving the European Union. The main issues within this case revolves around the Home Office denying the claimants right of residence in the UK, after he was a victim of domestic abuse at the hands of his durable partner.

 

In this blog we will examine why the Home Office denied him residency, his appeal of their decision and what this might mean for people in similar situations going forward.

 

The case in question: Singh vs Secretary of State for Home Department

 

The claimant in this case, Mr Singh, previously held residency in the UK on the basis of his durable relationship with his EU citizen partner. Due to instances of domestic abuse in the relationship against Singh, the relationship understandably came to an end.

 

After the breakdown of the relationship, Singh attempted to re-establish his UK residency via the EU Directive 2004/38/EC, which he understood to mean that victims of domestic abuse can retain their right to residency in the UK despite being unmarried to their abuser. He went as far to say that any other outcome which did not match his expectations would be equal to discriminatory behaviour.

 

In response, the Home Office were not willing to give Singh the result he was aiming for. They claimed that the time to rely on such legislation had expired, as such protection for victims of domestic abuse were only to be relied on where the durable relationship was still intact. In the case of Mr Singh, his relationship had ended quite some time before he raised the issue with the Home Office.

 

Singh went on to appeal this decision, but to his dismay the tribunal agreed with the Home Office. They found that the law on the issue was clear in that only where the durable relationship exists can a person benefit from such rules, and that in Mr Singh’s case too much time had passed, and the fact that he had never been married to his abuser, stood against him. They focussed on the fact that the legislation makes distinctions between direct family members (including spouses/civil partners) and extended family members (including durable partners), and has done so since the first European legislation on the issue.

 

It was concluded that The European Union clearly decided that certain family relationships will be protected, and others will not. Therefore, Mr Singh’s appeal was unsuccessful.

 

 

What does the EU Settlement Scheme say when it comes to residency for victims of domestic abuse?

 

The current rules state the following:

 

If you are a victim of domestic violence or abuse

 

You can apply if your family relationship to someone from the EU, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland or Liechtenstein who was living in the UK by 31 December 2020 has broken down permanently because of domestic violence or abuse.

 

You can apply if you are or were their:

 

  • spouse or civil partner
  • unmarried partner
  • child, grandchild or great-grandchild under 21 years old
  • dependent child, grandchild or great-grandchild over the age of 21
  • dependent parent, grandparent or great-grandparent
  • other dependent relative

 

Our thoughts

 

Some may look at Mr Singh’s case and feel like he was served an injustice, and they would have every right to feel this way. Domestic abuse is an extremely serious issue which can have life altering effects on those that fall victim to it, and those people deserve to be supported. That being said, there of course has to be some form of order and lines have to be drawn when it comes to the law so that everyone is treated fairly and held to the same standards. In this case, the amount of time that had passed meant that the durable relationship had been dissolved long enough for the Home Office to deem its relevance depleted in the case of Mr Singh’s residency.

 

We would urge people who find themselves in a similar situation to Mr Singh to act quickly, and assess their options in relation to the EU Settlement Scheme, as this looks to be the more reliable route to retaining UK residency. As always, we are here to help.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/ 

 

Or, download our free app! You can launch an enquiry, scan over documents, check progress on your case and much more!

 

Links to download below:

 

iPhone: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisas-law/id1503174541?ls=1

 

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lisaslaw 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

Purchasing a property is many peoples main lifetime goal, and often takes a lot of hard work, time and dedication to achieve. Not to mention the ever increasing costs of property in the UK. It is no surprise then that fraudsters will try to target those who are so close to completing the purchase of a property and strike at the absolute worst moment, leaving the would-be homeowners in a desperate situation, financially and emotionally.

 

This blog will focus on how this kind of property fraud often occurs and some new guidance which can help people avoid falling victim to it.

 

What is Property Title Fraud?

 

Property title fraud is quite rare in the grand scheme of things, but when it does occur it can do substantial damage and can lead to people losing their homes.

 

The main bulk of the scam involves a fraudster changing the registered details of a building so that they can pose as the buildings rightful owner. Once this has been done, the fraudster can apply for a mortgage or sell the property to a buyer and then vanish with the proceeds.

 

Essentially, they temporarily steal their victim’s identity, or that of someone else involved in a property purchase such as a conveyancer, in order to gain personal reward.

 

The year of 2020/21 garnered 22 claims of property title fraud. This may not sound like too much, but these claims led to a massive £3.5m worth of compensation of pay outs.

 

People who own houses that are left empty for long periods are particularly vulnerable to property title fraud, as well as properties which have a high value, are not mortgaged, or whose owners have recently passed away.

 

What does the new guidance suggest?

 

There are ways to fortify yourself and your property from the fraudsters who mean to take advantage of you. Some of which may be simpler than you think, and will definitely be worth doing. The below advice is from the Fraud Advisory Panel, HM Land Registry and the Law Society of England and Wales.

 

Firstly, it is important to remember that all homeowners are at risk of such fraud, but some are more at risk than others. For example, higher risk cases include:

 

Property owners who are:

 

  • Absent (eg, extended holiday, living abroad, in a care home or hospital)
  • Landlords
  • Deceased
  • Long-standing
  • Sole

 

Properties which are:

 

  • Not registered with HM Land Registry
  • Not mortgaged
  • Rented out
  • High value
  • Empty

 

 

Tips to make yourself safer!

 

Register you property with the HM Land Registry:

 

This is a very simple but effective step that can make life a lot easier for homeowners. Being registered with the HM Land Registry creates an official record that can be checked by anyone who needs to confirm your ownership and gives extra legal protections. If you do suffer a loss from this kind of fraud you might be entitled to compensation from HM Land Registry (depending on the circumstances).

 

If you are not registered it is much easier for a fraudster to forge some paper deeds and use them to register your property in their name, leaving you exposed to serious trouble.

 

Keep your registered details up to date:

 

Let the HM Land Registry know of any name changes of address changes that occur. They may need to send you official letters or notices which can act as an early sign of fraud. It is straightforward and quick to update your details, so make any changes as soon as possible.

 

Monitor your register entries:

 

All this requires is a simply signing up to HM Land Registry’s free property alert service. If someone tries to change the register for your property, potentially indicating fraudulent activity, you will be notified immediately. This is an extremely handy service and will give you some peace of mind.

 

This service can be used to monitor up to 10 properties, allowing you to take swift and effective action on any unwanted activity.

 

Restrict your property title:

 

If you or your property are at particular risk of fraudulent transfers, for example you fall into one of the categories above, it is worth considering applying for a ‘restriction’ to be placed on your title. It can come with a small fee but it is worth it.

 

What this means is that in the event of an attempted sale, a title restriction requires the conveyancer to formally certify that it really is the legitimate owner who is making the sale. It is another strong barrier against fraudsters, and can massively disrupt their plans.

 

Our thoughts

 

The guidance on offer here is sound, and many of the tips are very easy to put into practice. The phrase ‘better safe than sorry’ springs to mind, and what may take up half an hour of your day to get organised may just save you months of stress if you are targeted by fraudsters.

 

Fraud of all types is rife at the moment. If you are sent an email that you find suspicious, or are offered a deal on something that sounds too good to be true, always seek another opinion before clicking a link or agreeing to any kind of transaction. If it turns out that what you were offered was real, then a small delay will not matter. However, if you rush into something which is phoney, it can seriously upset your life. Be careful, and as always we are always here to help!

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

Or, download our free app! You can launch an enquiry, scan over documents, check progress on your case and much more!

 

Links to download below:

 

iPhone: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisas-law/id1503174541?ls=1

 

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lisaslaw 

 

 

 

 

 

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

We are over the moon to welcome Minnie Tse into our ranks, who has filled the role of Office Administrator! During her first week she has already exhibited excellent traits that are suited perfectly to the role, including being hard-working, focussed and with a fantastic attention to detail.

 

Minnie studied Sociology and Education in Hong Kong. Before coming to UK, she worked in the education sector for several years. She loves helping others, especially young people who have special educational needs, whom she worked with very closely in her previous role.

 

In her spare time, Minnie loves watching Korean drama and travelling.

 

Minnie is a native Cantonese speaker and is fluent in English and Mandarin. Her dream is to speak Korean and French fluently one day as well!

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/ 

 

Or, download our free app! You can launch an enquiry, scan over documents, check progress on your case and much more!

 

Links to download below:

 

iPhone: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisas-law/id1503174541?ls=1

 

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lisaslaw 

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

Losing a loved one is undeniably difficult and can lead to serious emotional anguish, depressive thoughts and in some cases trouble dealing with everyday life. It can often be the lowest point in someone’s life, and wherever possible those around them should offer support and comfort to help them get back on track.

 

When it comes to bereavement and work, there is a lot of grey area. Of course, many employers will be fully supportive of their employees and behave with understanding and empathy. However, it may surprise you that the law itself does not actually require them to do so. This is something that a handful of MPs have deemed unjust, and could persuade the government to change.

 

This blog will focus on the recent campaign to alter the UK’s bereavement rules for employees, and what the law currently says on this issue.

 

Bereavement Pay and Leave Bill wins second reading in March 2022

 

Patricia Gibson, member of the SNP party, has been working hard on a new bill that could see those who have lost a loved one be entitled to leave and payment from their employers over their grieving period. In her opinion, to simply rely on employers to be empathetic and give such treatment to their employees is naïve and does not match up to some people’s real life experience.

 

Gibson has already made a difference in this area, as her and some of her colleagues fought and won to give parents who lose a child up to the age of 18 full legal entitlement to leave and pay in the aftermath of such a tragedy. She now wants this same courtesy to be extended to situations where other family members and loved ones have died, such as partners, parents and other close relatives.

 

She is a firm believer that, if this bill is successful, it will lead to a healthier society, with a greater focus on the mental health of those who are part of it.

 

What is the current law for workers experiencing bereavement?

 

As we mentioned earlier in the article, in most instances there is no real legal backing for people experiencing bereavement who require time off. It comes down to the good-will of the employer. Patricia Gibson has, however, made it so parents are legally entitled to time off if their child dies.

 

If an employee’s child dies

 

Employees have a right to 2 weeks off if their child dies under the age of 18 or is stillborn after 24 weeks of pregnancy. This is known as ‘parental bereavement leave’.

 

In some cases employees and workers might also be eligible for ‘parental bereavement pay’.

 

Anyone classed as an employee also has the right to unpaid time off if their child (a ‘dependant’) dies under the age of 18.

 

If a child is stillborn after 24 weeks of pregnancy, the:

 

  • birth parent can get up to 52 weeks of statutory maternity leave or pay

 

  • father or partner can get up to 2 weeks paternity leave or pay

 

Both are entitled to 2 weeks parental bereavement leave after they finish their maternity or paternity leave.

 

Where an employee’s dependant dies

 

This is where things get a bit more confusing. An employee has the right to time off if a dependant dies, including:

 

  • their partner

 

  • their parent

 

  • their child (if under 18)

 

  • someone else who relied on them

 

However, no legal right for time off for dependants to be paid, but some employers might offer pay. There is also no guidance on how long this time off can last, only that it should be reasonable. This is obviously subjective and can differ from one person to the next.

 

In all circumstances there is no legal right for any of this time off to be paid. This is seen as a major issue by Patricia Gibson, as it may lead to people being left in a difficult financial position as well as an emotionally distressing one.

 

Time off for a funeral

 

An employee is entitled to time off for a funeral if the person who died was a dependant. For example, their partner or parent. Although, there is no legal right to time off for a funeral if the person who died was not a dependant, for example a friend.

 

The employee and employer may agree on using holiday leave or unpaid leave, but again this is not a legal requirement and may lead to uncomfortable situations if the employer does not behave in an empathetic manner.

 

 

Our thoughts

 

As a business ourselves, we understand the importance of looking after staff and doing everything we can to support them, especially if they are facing hardships. Therefore, we agree that clearer and more generous guidance is needed on this issue. Employers should not be able to simply outright refuse paid leave where their workers have lost someone close to them.

 

Clarity on this issue is the most important thing, as it will allow people understand their situation, while also giving them time to try and grieve without the added pressure that working can bring.

 

We look forward to seeing how the second reading of the Bereavement Pay and Leave Bill goes, and we will keep you right up to date with it on our blog.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/ 

 

Or, download our free app! You can launch an enquiry, scan over documents, check progress on your case and much more!

 

Links to download below:

 

iPhone: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisas-law/id1503174541?ls=1

 

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lisaslaw 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

When it comes to family proceedings, the default position is that each party covers their own legal costs. If there is some unreasonable conduct by one of the parties, or circumstances that are deemed relevant enough to warrant some kind of financial support or guarantee, then the courts may take this into consideration and orders can potentially be made. Costs made against parties are not that frequent, and it is more exceptional to order securities for costs. The case we will look at today illustrates a particular set of circumstances where the Court will do just this.

 

Firstly, what does ‘security for costs’ mean?

 

When we say ‘security for costs’ we are referring to an order which requires a party (usually the claimant) to pay money into court, or to act as a guarantor as security for their opponents legal fees. Whether or not such an order is made is up to the courts.

 

The main reason for these orders is to limit risking the awarded party from winning at trial, but then not being able to enforce a costs order against the rival party, either within the jurisdiction or abroad. In some instances, the claim may be discontinued until the security is provided.

 

Let’s look at a case: MG v AR

 

The case in question concerned an eight-year-old child of a Lebanese-Canadian mother and a father who has dual Saudi-British nationality, who had been subject to a Central Family Court order providing for her to remain in her mother’s primary care, with weekly contact with her father.

 

In April 2018 the mother took the child to Dubai, on what she claims was planned as a two week holiday. The father, on the other hand, claims that the trip was in order for the mother and child to relocate there permanently.

 

The mother and child ended up staying in Dubai until May 2019, claiming that the father had seized their passports (evidence to support this claim remains unfounded). After this period, they moved onto Canada where they lived for the past couple of years.

 

The father was successful in an application for the child’s return to Dubai, however this was set aside in April 2020 by the Court of Appeal of Ontario. Essentially, the father’s return application could only go ahead on the condition that he promptly commence a similar proceeding in the Central Family Court, where he could apply through the Ontario court to lift the stay and seek a rehearing of his original application should the English court decline jurisdiction.

 

In legal terms, the father could only succeed if he successfully invoked the parens patriae jurisdiction based on the child’s British citizenship. At the pre-trial review the mother applied for an order for security for costs against the father, amounting to £127,000 as a result of costs and financial orders made in previous proceedings.

 

 

What must the court consider?

 

There are a number of issues the court will look at when deciding to move on an application for security of costs or not. Some of which we will list below:

 

  • The likelihood of a successful claim – if there is clearly no road to success for the person applying, the court is highly unlikely to order security as the defendant is unlikely to achieve a costs order in its favour.

 

  • If the court determines that the defendant has a good chance of obtaining a costs order, it must then be satisfied by evidence that there is a real risk that they will not be in a position to enforce that costs order.

 

  • The conduct of the relevant party throughout prior proceedings.

 

  • The court may reflect future litigation uncertainties, as well as potential reductions on a detailed assessment, in a percentage discount from the sum claimed.

 

  • The court must be sure that whatever choice they make is ultimately just.

 

 

What did the courts decide in this case?

 

With regard to the above points, the courts concluded that the father did not have a meritorious substantive case and that in fact the mother had a good chance of obtaining a costs order. It was found that the father did have the means to pay such costs and that the mother would face significant difficulties enforcing any costs order.

 

Due to these circumstances, the courts made an order for security for costs against the father in the mother’s favour of £50,000. This was to be paid as a single lump sum.

 

What do we think?

 

Legal proceedings can often be stressful enough, and in certain circumstances can lead to financial difficulties. These court orders for financial security can make a big difference to people, and should be used, but only when the specific situation arises that deems them just. It would be unfair for people to be on the correct side of the law, win their case, but still be unable to rely on not coming out of the situation financially unstable through no fault of their own.

 

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

Or, download our free app! You can launch an enquiry, scan over documents, check progress on your case and much more!

 

Links to download below:

 

iPhone: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisas-law/id1503174541?ls=1

 

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lisaslaw 

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

We are absolutely delighted to welcome Katherine Sun who joins us as a Legal Assistant. She has already shown herself to be extremely hardworking and friendly, fitting in to the team excellently.

 

After working in one of the leading entertainment companies in Beijing, Sohu, Inc, as a legal advisor for 4 years, Katherine came to London and has since completed two master’s degrees, majoring in Marketing and Management of Intellectual property. She is looking forward to enhancing her legal skills here with us at Lisa’s Law.

 

In her spare time Katherine enjoys going to the gym, listening to music and watching Netflix. She also enjoys socialising with friends, and is a huge Harry Potter fan. We are sure that she will bring some magic of her own to our firm!

 

Katherine speaks fluent Mandarin and English.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

Or, download our free app! You can launch an enquiry, scan over documents, check progress on your case and much more!

 

Links to download below:

 

iPhone: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisas-law/id1503174541?ls=1

 

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lisaslaw 

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

Have a question? Our friendly and experienced team are here to help.

Subscribe to our newsletter

We post weekly articles covering a variety of topics, including immigration, property, and more, so subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.