13 London Road,
London, SE1 6JZ
020 7928 0276
info@lisaslaw.co.uk

News and Insights

Other from traditional property sales, property auctions are considered another effective way to sell and acquire properties in the UK. According to data from the Office for National Statistics, 652,000 homes were sold in England and Wales in 2020, with around 18,000-20,000 of those residential properties sold by auction. This accounts for 2.2% of total home sales. While not a large proportion of sales, property auction sales are a significant one. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of buying or selling an auction property.

 

Copy of Namecard for article - Jackie in English

 

Auction property purchases are considered suitable for sellers with a subjective value who want to market their properties to a large audience of potential buyers. Auction listings can be put online by auction houses and can attract bidders across the world, meaning that sellers do not have to simply rely on regional auction houses within the UK. This will expose the property to a wide range of potential buyers. Statistics suggest that if you put a property up for auction, you have more than a 50 per cent chance of success of selling them this way.

 

Auctions can be attractive to property investors as they may secure assets below market value. It is also attractive to sellers as a reserve price can be set up to ensure that you don’t sell for less than an amount you are comfortable with, hence it creates a win – win situation for both sellers and buyers!

 

Advantages of Auction

 

The main advantage for selling property at auction is that it is normally quicker than the traditional sale process.  Auctioneers provide certain information and searches concerning the property before bidding begins, potential buyers are made aware of the basic information about the property, and only serious buyers join in the bidding process.  Then, as soon as the auctioneer bangs his gavel on the desk, the sale is complete. The successful bidder will sign the contract with an actual date of completion determined and pay deposit right away, meaning there is minimal risk of the sale falling through. Transparency and certainty are considered key advantages of an auction sale.

 

Risks of buying a property at auction

 

If you are potential buyer, you should also bear in mind the risks of buying a property at auction.

 

Firstly, you may not have enough information about the property at the time you enter into a binding contract to purchase, whether that’s the structure and conditions of the property itself, or the legal implications. This causes a major dilemma due to the fact that it will be a waste of money and time to investigate the title if you do not eventually succeed in bidding, but it would also be too late to raise requisitions on the title after you have entered into a contract.

 

Secondly, given the tight timeframe to complete, usually within 28 days, you may not be financially prepared in advance, particularly if mortgage financing is required.

 

Thirdly, if you are not familiar with the market and procedures, you may find yourself overpaying for the property! Since auction sales are usually subject to  Common Auction Conditions, if you are not a professional bidder, you may not have sufficient knowledge of the relevant terms applicable to your purchase. This may cause you to eventually find yourself stuck in the middle of some onerous terms which you have not anticipated.

 

It is therefore advisable for you to consult your solicitors prior to entering any contractual relationship. Lisa’s Law is experienced in dealing with both residential and commercial properties auction cases and you will be advised extensively throughout the process. Feel free to contact us if you have any enquiries.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

The Home Office has updated its guidance to clarify the conditions under which partners on the five-year route (commonly known as spouse visa) can access public funds without being transferred to the ten-year route. So, when can partners access public funds? Keep reading to find out.

 

mahfuz namecard

 

Previously, there was ambiguity around whether individuals with leave to remain as partners on the five-year route who applied for a change of conditions to access public funds would be forced into the longer ten-year route. The updated guidance specifies that if the No Recourse to Public Funds (NRPF) condition is lifted, the individual’s financial circumstances will be reassessed upon their application for further leave to remain.

 

If they meet the financial requirement but are receiving public funds, they will be contacted by the Home Office to confirm if they wish to be moved to the ten-year partner route instead.

 

Our thoughts

 

This clarification is a positive step towards transparency and fairness in the immigration process. It ensures that those in genuine need can access necessary public funds without the penalty of an extended path to settlement.

 

However, the re-evaluation of financial circumstances could create uncertainty and stress for applicants who may already be in precarious situations. The Home Office should ensure this process is handled sensitively and efficiently.

 

If you would like more information about how partners on the five-year route can access public funds, please contact us today.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

Property transactions can be complex and often involve large sums of money, making them a prime target for fraudsters. In fact, property transactions now make up 70% of all fraud, underlining the crucial role conveyancers play in protecting their clients from property fraud. Conveyancers do this by implementing various measures to ensure the integrity of the transaction.

 

property fraud legal article - Sam - Lisa's Law

 

This article explains common fraud schemes in property transactions and the steps conveyancers take to protect their clients.

 

What Are the Most Common Fraud Schemes in Property Transactions?

 

The most common types of fraud schemes in property transactions include the following:

 

1. Identity Theft:

  • Fraudsters may steal the identity of the property owner to sell or mortgage the property without the owner’s knowledge

2. Fake Buyers or Sellers:

  • Fraudsters pose as buyers or sellers to manipulate the transaction and extract funds

3. Email Interception:

  • Hackers intercept emails between conveyancers and clients to redirect funds to fraudulent accounts

 

What Measures Do We Take to Protect Clients?

 

In order to protect our clients from these property transaction fraud schemes, we take a number of measures.

 

1. Identity Verification:

  • We rigorously verify the identity of all parties involved in the transaction to ensure they are who they claim to be

2. Secure Communication:

  • We use secure communication channels to prevent email interception and unauthorised access and hold a Cyber Essentials Certificate accredited by the IASME Consortium Ltd. Our practice is protected by strict MFA and VPN safeguards

3. Fraud Awareness Training:

  • Our staff receive regular cyber security training on the latest fraud schemes and how to identify suspicious activities.. We conduct system penetration test weekly to minimise the risks of cyber attack

4. Client Education:

  • Informing clients about the risks of property fraud and advising them on how to protect their information and money during the transaction

 

Final thoughts

 

By taking these steps, Lisa’s Law helps safeguard our clients against property fraud, ensuring a secure and smooth property transaction process. Our experienced conveyancing team take pride in protecting our clients from undue harm during what is undoubtedly a very important moment in their lives.

 

If you have any questions about property fraud or wish for us to represent you in a property transaction of your own, please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

Online fraud is rampant these days. Unlike in the past, now anyone in the world is potentially able to scam you. This puts individuals at risk of losing their money like never before. In today’s case, Larsson v Revolut, Larsson, who was the victim of APP fraud, was convinced to transfer substantial funds (466,617.73 Swiss Francs) from his account in Switzerland to various accounts at e-money institution, Revolut, which he believed had been opened in his name for the purchase of shares in an entity which did not exist.

 

Revolut was accused of failing to detect and prevent the fraud from those recipient accounts, leading to Larsson’s financial loss. Let’s take a look at the case in question, as well as what you can do to prevent yourself becoming a victim of APP (authorised push payment) fraud.

 

What did the court decide?

Among other things, the court considered the issues of whether Revolut owed Larsson the contractual or tortious duties. The court rejected the contention that Revolut owed the contractual duty of care to Larsson based on the facts.

 

The court also rejected the contention that Revolut owed a tortious duty of care to Larsson. No duty of care was owed generally to third party payers such as Larsson. The judge refused to impose a duty simply because Larsson was a customer of Revolut. The judge also held that the possibility of damage being suffered, if Revolut did not take reasonable care in dealing with incoming payments, is no more foreseeable because the payer happens to be a customer of the bank than if it was a third party.

 

In this case, the court found no duty of care, either contractual or tortious, owed to a third party who is not the customer of the money institution when processing payments.

 

What protections are there for victims of APP fraud?

 

Many will be surprised to hear that Revolut does not in fact have a banking licence in the UK, despite applying for one. This means that Revolut customers in the UK are particularly vulnerable to APP fraud. Furthermore, Revolut is also not signed up to the contingent reimbursement model code. This voluntary code that many banks and financial institutions have signed up to sets out how defrauded customers should get their money back.

 

It is advisable not to keep large sums of money in your Revolut account if you have one due to the difficulty in getting your money back if you fall victim to a scam.

 

According to Action Fraud, the number of complaints of fraud rose by over 500 in 2024 from 567 in February 2023 to 1,086 in February 2024. APP fraud is a particularly notorious type of fraud which enables fraudsters to make real-time payments from victims to fraudsters.

 

How can you protect yourself from APP fraud?

 

Close up young woman hands holding credit card and using mobile smart phone.

 

Scammers will often impersonate trusted individuals or institutions in order to convince you to transfer the funds, meaning it can sometimes be easy to be swayed into doing what they are asking you to do. Other modes include phishing, invoice scams, romance scams, and investment scams, as happened in the above case.

 

To protect yourself from APP scams, you should take a number of steps prior to making unexpected requests for money.

 

Firstly, it is important to verify the identity of the person requesting money or information. Scammers can change their caller ID to match your bank so if you are in any doubt, contact your bank or financial institution directly to verify if they are requesting information from you .

 

Most banks or financial institutions have a stronger method of verification than they used to in the form of two-factor authentication. This prevents scammers from accessing your account even if they possess your login details.

 

You should also verify that you are sending money to the right person. Most banking apps feature a verification tick indicating that the bank details match the account name. Furthermore, if in doubt you should double check the details to ensure that you don’t send money to the wrong person.

 

If you think you have been a victim of APP fraud then you should report it to your bank, the police, and any anti-fraud organisations. They will be able to give you advice and help you to investigate the scam and avoid losing any additional money.

 

Finally, make sure you do thorough research prior to making any investments, especially if someone approaches you out of the blue regarding an investment opportunity. The vast majority of the time it is likely to be a scam.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

A British Airways passenger who slipped on a puddle of baileys and suffered a traumatic brain injury could be owed £4m in a compensation claim against the airline.

 

When we shop, eat in restaurants, or sit in cafes, we may occasionally encounter some unexpected situations, such as slipping. While most of the time you will probably be fine, in some situations these accidents can cause serious injuries. So, if such an accident does happen, who is responsible? A recent case sheds some light on this issue.

 

Background

 

Andreas Wuchner is a businessman who ran an office supplies business prior to his injury. In November 2017, he and his business partner came to the UK to discuss business and watch a football match. A few days later, they were preparing to return to Zurich from London. Due to bad traffic that day, he and his friend missed the flight. He therefore had no choice but to book the next flight.

 

However, the two still failed to arrive at the airport in advance. After passing through security, he and his business partner were the last passengers to board. Even though the flight was about to take off, he stopped at Starbucks in the airport and bought two espressos and two macchiatos.

 

15 minutes before the scheduled departure time of the flight, he rushed to the check-in gate carrying four cups of coffee and slipped on the puddle of Baileys.

 

The fall was very serious. According to eyewitnesses at the scene, Wuchner flew approximately two metres into the air and hit his head on the ground hard. He was then sent to the hospital. Since the accident, he has suffered recurring headaches that can last up to two weeks. His company also faced bankruptcy a few months later due to his inability to work as a result of his head injury.

 

BA sued for more than £5m due to injuries and loss of business and career

 

White Passenger plane fly up over take-off runway from airport w

 

Wuchner then sued the airline for more than £5 million to compensate for his claim that he could no longer work due to his injuries and the loss of his business and career.

 

Initially, Wuchner was entitled to at least £120,000 in compensation under the Convention Liability Rules for Passengers on International Flights. In 2021, a British judge awarded him £130,000 in compensation, which Wuchner accepted. However, the gentleman’s legal team said he could get more compensation.

 

So, for the past two years, he has continued to request an increase in the amount of compensation, saying that because of the fall, he often suffers from “forgetfulness” and “lack of concentration.”

 

British Airways’ lawyers said they disagreed with the additional claim. The airline argued that Wuchner could have bought coffee on the plane. Instead, he stopped at Starbucks to buy coffee near take-off time. He knew he was going to be late, so he rushed to the gate with four cups of coffee, which led to the incident. British Airways therefore claimed they should be exempted from liability.

 

In response, Andreas replied: “I really enjoy a proper coffee out of a coffee machine, rather than the normal airport coffee, which is why I went to Starbucks. I went as quickly as possible to the boarding gate, bearing in mind I had four coffees in my hand.” He added, “I wasn’t running, but I went as quickly as I could. I was walking swiftly, bearing in mind the safety of my coffee cups.”

 

The judge in the Central London county court in charge of the case held that British Airways must be held responsible for the accident. The judge said that British Airways should bear the main responsibility because British Airways employees had the responsibility to ensure the safety of the area. If British Airways staff had cleaned up the leak on the ground in time or warned passengers of the danger, the accident might have been avoided.

 

However, since Andreas himself was also partially responsible and was considered “jointly negligent”, he could not obtain the full compensation of 5 million pounds he requested. The assessment results showed that he could obtain 80% of his claim of 5 million pounds. In other words, British Airways had to pay the passenger up to 4 million pounds in compensation.

 

So, who is responsible if a customer suffers an accident in a store?

 

Accidents in stores are actually quite common, with the most common causes being slips, trips and falls, being hit by falling objects, machinery accidents and criminal attacks. These accidents can result in minor to severe injuries such as broken bones, lacerations and traumatic brain injuries, and can seriously affect your ability to work and perform daily activities.

 

Even if the result of this case is not in line with the wishes of the parties involved, the compensation of 4 million pounds is still a huge amount. Despite economic pressures, British Airways is estimated to have strong enough financial strength to pay this money. However, imagine for a moment that you are running a small restaurant or a shop and a customer has an accident. You may have to pay compensation to the customer, the consequences you need to bear will be huge, and you may be unable to repay even if you lose everything. Therefore, everyone must understand the legal rules of the UK and be prepared in advance.

 

Under the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957, the owner or occupier of premises has a duty of care towards visitors, which means they have a duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of their guests while on the premises.

 

There are some reasonable protective measures that occupiers can take, such as:

  • When food is spilled on the floor, they have a system to clean it up immediately
  • Clean the floors on site at the appropriate times and with good enough products and equipment.
  • Implement systems to detect, mark, isolate and repair damaged floors
  • Make sure cleaning staff use electrical outlets close to where they work; this will help prevent long trailing cords from becoming a tripping hazard.

 

In addition, you can also consider purchasing Public Liability Insurance, which can help you reduce financial difficulties and risks when you need to bear legal liability for your customers. The insurance company will pay your legal fees and all claims. If a customer has an accident in your store, please contact Lisa Law Firm immediately. Our litigation team can provide you with professional advice.

 

No matter if a person falls or is injured in a cafe, restaurant, cinema, shopping mall, gym, etc., if the cause is due to the failure of the owner or occupier of the venue to take reasonable measures, the owner or occupier of the venue shall be held responsible.

 

Fall And Fall Injury Accident At Workplace. Man Fell Down Stairs

 

How can customers file an accident claim?

 

As mentioned above, every store owner and store employee has a duty of care to their customers, so if you have been injured because a store owner breached their duty of care, you may be eligible to have a lawyer file a personal injury claim on your behalf. Generally, your lawyer will help you determine whether:

  • Another party, such as a shop owner or operator, owes you a duty of care
  • Their negligence or intentional behavior caused the accident
  • You suffered damages and other losses as a result
  • Your accident occurred within the past three years, or within a relevant time frame that may apply to your case

 

If you are injured in a store accident, it is important to gather as much evidence as possible both at the scene and afterward to ensure your attorney can defend you as strongly as possible:

 

  • Seek medical help as soon as possible, either by calling 111, visiting your GP, a minor injuries unit or an emergency department. This will ensure you have a record of any medical treatment you received, which will be important evidence in your claim;
  • Notify a store employee or manager of the accident and provide them with details of what happened and the injuries you sustained. Make sure they record the accident in their accident log and ask for a copy of their signed report as proof of the date, time and location of the accident to you;
  • Gather evidence to support your claim. For example, take photos of the accident scene, your injuries, and any dangerous conditions that led to the accident. Also, get the contact information of any witnesses who were present at the time of the accident to support your version of events in the event of a liability dispute;
  • Keep copies of any medical reports, invoices or receipts related to your injuries and treatment. These documents will be important when making a claim.
  • Seek legal advice from a personal injury lawyer who specializes in helping people who have been injured in stores. They will evaluate the details of your case, explain your rights, and guide you through the claims process.
  • If you believe the incident was caused by negligence or a dangerous condition in the store, please consider making a formal complaint to store management or the appropriate department. This will help ensure that the necessary steps are taken to prevent similar incidents in the future.

 

Once liability has been established and you have all the necessary evidence to support your case, your lawyer will contact the other party and inform them of your intent to file a claim for compensation. If they admit liability for your injuries, you can begin negotiating a settlement. Otherwise, your lawyer will help you take legal action to file a lawsuit in court.

 

If you have an accident in a public place and are not sure who is responsible, or if you want to sue a store owner but don’t know what to do, please contact Lisa’s Law Solicitors immediately. Our litigation team can provide you with professional advice. If you have any questions about this article, you can also contact us for further information.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

We all like a bargain, don’t we? From coupons to voucher codes, most people want to pay the best price for something if possible. This is where websites like Wowcher come in. Nominally offering the best deals on a range of products, the e-commerce website has risen to prominence in recent years and is one of the most popular deal websites of its kind in the UK. Despite this, Wowcher recently ran into hot water with the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) over its promotion of products and services to customers.

 

As a result of action by the CMA, Wowcher will now revise its promotional strategy and be forced into providing £4m in refunds to consumers overall. Let’s look into how Wowcher fell foul of the rules, as well as the action the CMA has taken against them.

 

Why did the CMA take this action against Wowcher?

 

The CMA claims that it was forced into taking this action against Wowcher as a result of the promotion of products and services on Wowcher’s website. This included the usage of countdown timers, scarcity claims and countdown claims to pressure customers in making purchases they may otherwise not make. The CMA instead found that the vast majority of prices remained the same following the timer’s completion. Furthermore, the use of pre-ticked boxes signing customers up to its VIP membership was seen as risking people signing up without their full understanding.

 

The CMA originally launched an investigation into Wowcher last March over the aforementioned concerns, which culminated in the CMA now securing £4m in refunds for consumers.

 

What was the outcome of the CMA’s findings?

 

In November of 2023, the CMA wrote a letter to Wowcher which set out their concerns about Wowcher’s practises. They also warned that failure to change their practises would risk potential court action by the CMA.

 

Due to the outcome of the CMA’s investigation, Wowcher has agreed to the following exact undertakings:

 

  • Only use clear and accurate countdown timers: Timers must not mislead consumers or give a false impression that they have to act quickly to avoid missing out on a deal. Wowcher will also remove its permanent countdown timer at the top of its homepage which states ‘Deals refresh in*: XX:XX:XX:XX’ and counts down to midnight, suggesting those deals may then change or end.

 

  • Make sure all marketing claims are clear and accurate: Claims about the scarcity of a deal – e.g. ‘Almost gone – only 2 remaining!’ – must accurately reflect Wowcher’s remaining stock levels, among other things. Claims about the popularity of a deal – e.g. ‘In high demand!’ [see Figure 3] – must accurately reflect Wowcher’s sales figures, as well as how popular a deal is compared to other similar deals.

 

  • Refund customers who were signed up to ‘VIP membership’ via a pre-ticked box: Wowcher will provide a credit refund – with the option to exchange to cash – to over 870,000 customers and will stop the use of pre-ticked boxes for VIP sign-ups, to ensure customers are fully aware of what they are agreeing to. Based on information provided by Wowcher, the CMA expects refunds for those affected will total over £4 million.

 

 

Wowcher must also report back to the CMA throughout the year to ensure that they continue to comply with the above commitments that they signed.

 

Our thoughts

 

It is important to note that despite the undertakings which Wowcher agreed to, these were provided to the CMA voluntarily. This is therefore not indicative of any wrongdoing or liability. Only a court will be able to decide whether a breach of the law has occurred.

 

The decision by the CMA to take action on what they viewed as a flagrant abuse of Wowcher’s promotional strategies will be welcomed by consumers. While it could be argued that the onus should be placed on the consumer to ensure that they are not ripped off, those who are more vulnerable may be more likely to use bargain websites like Wowcher. The creation of a false sense of urgency and scarcity regarding products is therefore  necessary to protect such consumers.

 

The CMA has continued to become more powerful in recent years, with the recently passed Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 further strengthening the body. This legislation will enable the CMA to fine firms that break consumer law up to 10% of their global turnover.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) has ruled in favour of an applicant whose settlement application under the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) was delayed due to ongoing criminal proceedings for alleged offences committed before the end of the Brexit transition period. The Tribunal found that the policy of the Secretary of State was unlawful.

 

Specifically, the policy mandated that if there was an ongoing prosecution which could result in a conviction and subsequent refusal based on suitability, the EU Settlement Scheme application decision making process had to be paused until the prosecution’s outcome was determined, even if the offence did not meet the criteria for referral to immigration enforcement.

 

mahfuz namecard

 

The case concerned is R (on the application of Krzysztofik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (The Independent Monitoring Authority for the Citizens’ Rights Agreements intervening). Keep reading to learn more about the background of the case and its implications.

 

Background

 

The applicant, a Polish national, had applied for settlement under the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) after entering the United Kingdom. While his application was under review, he faced four charges for actions that occurred before the Brexit transition period ended. The Secretary of State put his EUSS application on hold due to these pending charges, following the ‘pause policy.’

 

This policy dictates that if an applicant is facing prosecution that might result in a conviction and a subsequent refusal based on suitability, the EUSS application must be delayed until the prosecution’s outcome is determined, regardless of whether the offence qualifies for immigration enforcement referral. The applicant challenged the legality of this policy, arguing that it unlawfully neglected to consider his specific circumstances.

 

Upper Tribunal Decision

 

The issue the Tribunal had to determine was whether the pause policy under which applications under the EUSS were paused pending determination of criminal prosecutions in respect of the applicant was unlawful.

 

As a matter of public interest, delaying the decision on an application is reasonable and proportionate if the alleged conduct is likely to result in a conviction and deportation based on the residence threshold.

 

However, the current policy extends to conduct that is not likely to lead to a conviction and deportation. The policy’s design prevents the review of an applicant’s residence length in the UK, making it impossible to determine the applicable threshold before pausing the application. As a result, the stay is enforced without fact-finding, relevant facts, or a reasoned decision, and without inviting the applicant’s representations.

 

Alleged criminality should only justify a stay if it could lead to a refusal of residence based on the threshold and proportionality. Pausing cases without this justification undermines public confidence, as those individuals are not likely to be removed. This approach delays applicants from securing their entitled status when there is no likelihood of refusal after criminal proceedings. Such a policy is incompatible with the Withdrawal Agreement’s requirements for individual, fact-based, and proportionate decision-making in a reasonable time.

 

Therefore, the Secretary of State had a duty to provide accurate legal advice to decision-makers but failed to do so, making the policy unlawful.

 

Our comments

 

We welcome the Upper Tribunal’s judgment, which highlights the flaws in the Secretary of State’s ‘pause policy’ under the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS). This policy, which mandated pausing applications due to pending criminal prosecutions regardless of the severity of the alleged offences, was rightly deemed unlawful. Delaying decisions without considering the specifics of each case, including the likelihood of conviction and deportation, is not only impractical but also unjust.

 

Such a blanket approach disregards individual circumstances and unnecessarily prolongs uncertainty for applicants. This ruling reinforces the need for a more nuanced and proportionate system, ensuring that decisions are made based on facts and individual merit, thereby restoring public confidence and aligning with the Withdrawal Agreement’s requirements for timely and fair decision-making.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

In the latest King’s Speech, the monarch set out the newly-elected government’s plans for the forthcoming parliament. With over 35 bills in total, the policy platform signals the intention of the government to live up to their election slogan for ‘change’. Some of the most eye-catching announcements are related to property law reform, the subject of today’s article.

 

So, let’s take a brief look at what the government have planned for property law reform, starting with reform to the rental sector.

 

Renters’ Rights Bill

 

The Renters’ Rights Bill is a key facet of the Labour Party’s manifesto commitment to ‘level the playing field between landlord and tenant’. Many of the policies included already formed part of the Renters (Reform) Bill. Nonetheless, the bill will do the following:

 

  • Abolish Section 21 no fault evictions
  • Empowering tenants to challenge rent increases designed to force them out ‘by the back door’
  • Applying Awaab’s law to the private sector, meaning the punishment of agents or landlords who don’t fix damp and mould problems quickly
  • The creation of a digital national database of landlords and their properties
  • Stopping agents and landlords from encouraging bidding wars
  • Applying a Decent Homes Standard to the private rented sector
  • Give tenants the right to request a pet which landlords cannot unreasonably refuse. Landlords will however be able to request insurance to cover potential damage from pets
  • Make it illegal for landlords to discriminate against tenants who have children or are in receipt of benefits
  • Strengthen local councils’ enforcement powers

 

This Bill will strengthen protections in the private rented sector for the 11 million private tenants in England and Wales.

 

The Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill

 

Further changes will be introduced to reform leasehold and commonhold, with the aim of providing homeowners with greater rights, powers and protections over their homes. This will be done through the implementation of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 which was passed by the previous government.

 

However, the government aim on going a step further than the Conservative government by seeking to “bring the feudal leasehold system to an end” by introducing a new legal framework to reinvigorate commonhold. New leasehold flats will also be banned so that commonhold becomes the default tenure.

 

The steps the government will take to reform leasehold include the following:

 

  • Enacting remaining Law Commission recommendations to bolster leaseholders’ fundamental rights to extend their leasehold as well as buy their freehold.
  • Modernising the commonhold legal framework and restrict the sale of new leasehold flats
  • Regulating ground rents for existing leaseholders
  • Bringing the injustice of so-called ‘fleecehold’ private estates and unfair costs to an end
  • End forfeiture, preventing leaseholders from losing savings in their home due to small unpaid debts

 

These reforms in the draft bill are in addition to the measures included in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act including:

 

  • Banning the sale of new leasehold houses
  • Make it cheaper and easier to extend a lease or buy the freehold
  • Expands rights for leaseholders to manage their building
  • Greater transparency for leaseholders
  • Scrapping the presumption that leaseholders pay their freeholders’ legal costs
  • Expanding rights of redress

 

The Planning and Infrastructure Bill

 

Finally, the government intend to supercharge growth in the economy through supply side reforms related to planning reform. They identify the current planning regime as a “major brake on economic growth”, ensuring the importance of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill in relation to their economic strategy. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill will therefore:

 

  • Streamline the delivery process for critical infrastructure
  • Further reform compulsory purchase compensation rules
  • Improve local planning decision making
  • Increase local planning authorities’ capacity
  • Use development to fund nature recovery

 

Our thoughts

 

Overall, the reforms made by the government so early into their time in office will be welcomed by many across the country. Despite the bold action on renters’ rights, implementing many of the policies the Conservatives failed to deliver on, it seems that the government has slightly toned down its rhetoric from when it was in opposition when it comes to reforming leasehold.

 

Originally, Labour pledged to abolish leasehold within the first 100 days of government, before dropping this in April. However, some within the industry have welcomed this, seeing this as a sign that the government is taking its time with leasehold reform, which seems sensible given its complexities. Despite this, they have continued to indicate their desire to “bring the feudal leasehold system to an end” but without a defined timeframe. Leaseholders will hope that their actions speak as loudly as their words.

 

On planning and infrastructure, the government have signalled their intent to tackle “nimbyism” by specifically mentioning their desire to take on local planning, which they hope will help to speed up and streamline the planning process.

 

One legal concern raised is that the property law reform aims to enable construction on less desirable green belt areas, known as the “grey belt.” We recognise the potential controversies of nimbyism as mentioned above but would like to point out the importance of building more homes to ensure housing accessibility and affordability for future generations.

 

Follow us for further updates on all things property, or contact us for help with your conveyancing and property needs!

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

The Home Office has recently updated its guidance concerning leave to remain for victims of trafficking and modern slavery by announcing a temporary suspension of all decisions related to recovery from harm. The exact reason for this pause is unclear, but it may be due to ongoing litigation, the need for direction from the new government, or both.

 

mahfuz namecard

 

Presently, Temporary Permission to Stay for Victims of Human Trafficking or Slavery (VTS) can be obtained where the relevant Competent Authority has made a positive conclusive grounds decision that an individual is a victim of modern slavery, and the Home Office consider leave is necessary in order to:

 

1. Assist the person in their recovery from any physical or psychological harm arising from the relevant exploitation – Section 65(4)(a) of the Nationality and Borders Act (NAB) makes it clear that permission to stay is not necessary for this purpose if the Secretary of State considers that the person’s need for assistance is capable of being met in either a country of which the person is a national or citizen or a country which is one to which the person may be removed in accordance with an agreement between that country and the UK.

 

2. Enable the person to seek compensation in respect of the relevant exploitation – Section 65(4)(b) of the NAB Act makes it clear that permission to stay is not necessary for this purpose if the Secretary of State considers that the person is capable of seeking compensation from outside the UK and it would be reasonable for the person to do so in the circumstances

 

3. Enable the person to co-operate with a public authority in connection with an investigation or criminal proceedings in respect of the relevant exploitation

 

The updated guidance now includes the following notice: ‘We are pausing all decisions that consider grants of temporary permission to stay for victims of human trafficking or slavery (VTS) until further notice. This is a temporary pause whilst we consider our approach to granting VTS where there is a need to assist in recovery from physical or psychological harm with regards to the victim’s experience of exploitation.’

 

Our thoughts

 

This suspension may cause concern among those who have been waiting for many years for a decision on their trafficking leave. However, it is possible that this pause will lead to a revised approach, which would be a positive development given the significant challenges and low approval rates currently faced by survivors seeking leave under the existing rules.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

A new government means a change in direction, and after 14 years of Conservative Government, it is unsurprising that the Labour government is keen to implement its policy agenda quickly. The UK economy has struggled since Covid, particularly when it comes to productivity, which ranks poorly compared with countries such as Germany, France, and the United States.

 

Part of the blame for the UK’s poor productivity has been attributed to the number of people who have dropped out of working altogether since Covid, a uniquely British phenomenon which hasn’t been reflected elsewhere. Long-term sickness is at record levels, rising sharply after the beginning of the pandemic in 2020. The newly-elected government will therefore hope to improve workers’ rights in order to encourage people to come back to work.

 

Employment law is an issue which affects all of us who work, so cannot be ignored ahead of some of the more high-profile issues such as immigration and housing. Let’s take a look at what the new government has planned.

 

Employment law

 

 

In their manifesto, Labour announced that they will introduce what they call a “New Deal for Working People” within 100 days. This ‘New Deal’ includes the following reforms.

 

Banning exploitative zero hours contracts

 

Zero hours contracts have received criticism from unions and politicians alike over the instability they offer in terms of work. However, this is sometimes countered by some of those working in zero hour contract jobs, who say that it gives them flexibility in their work.

 

Instead, Labour have promised to end ‘one sided’ flexibility and ensure that all jobs provide a “baseline level of security and predictability”. In practise, this will mean ensuring that everyone has the right to a contract at work which reflects the number of hours they regularly work based on a 12-week reference period.

 

Ending fire and rehire

 

The Labour government have also promised to end fire and rehire, a controversial practise which allows some employers to threaten employees with termination of their contracts in order to change an employee’s terms and conditions.

 

This will be done by reforming the law to prevent abuse by employers and strength the code of practise.

 

Introducing day one employment rights to parental leave, sick pay and protection from unfair dismissal

 

Labour have also proposed introducing what they describe as basic individual rights from day one for all workers, such as unfair dismissal parental leave and sick pay. Currently, workers have limited rights to appeal against dismissal if they have been with their current employer for less than 2 years.

 

Despite this, employers will still be able to remove employees for reasons of fair dismissal, allowing employers to continue operating probationary periods to assess new hires.

 

Merging employee and worker status

 

Another significant proposal made by the Labour Party is to move from a three-tiered system of employment status made up of employees, self-employed people and workers, to a two-part employment status framework of workers and the self-employed.

 

Pay

 

Significant changes are also set to be made to pay. Let’s take a look at a few of these.

 

Making the minimum wage a “genuine living wage”

 

To do this, Labour would change the remit of the Low Pay Commission so that the minimum wage takes into account the cost of living in addition to median wages and economic conditions.

 

While the minimum wage currently differs depending on a person’s age, up to a maximum of £11.44 for those aged 21 and over, this would be equalised for all age groups. As a result, under 18s currently earning £6.40 an hour would earn the same as those aged 21 or over.

 

Sick pay

 

The Labour Party would also reform sick pay to “strengthen” statutory sick pay, remove the lower earnings limit so that it is available to all workers and remove the waiting period.

 

Unpaid internships

 

Unpaid internships will be banned unless they are part of an education or training course.

 

While it is currently illegal for employers to not pay workers at least the national minimum wage, there are exemptions for those doing an internship of less than a year for a UK-based higher education course, those who are volunteering at a charity or voluntary organisation, or those who are work-shadowing.

 

Unpaid internships are often criticised as a barrier to those from poorer backgrounds, with those from wealthier backgrounds able to be supported by their family when undertaking an unpaid internship in order to get into a specific industry.

 

Our thoughts

 

The aforementioned changes would have a seismic impact in the workforce if implemented. For example, the change to making unfair dismissal a day-one right will force employers to carry out a fair procedure in all dismissal cases regardless of how long someone has been employed. The merging of worker and employee statuses would also greatly expand rights to those classified as workers. For instance, workers do not currently benefit from the right to unfair dismissal protection.

 

Nevertheless, it is worth bearing in mind that some of the government’s other proposals, such as the merging of employee and worker status, would take longer than others.

 

At Lisa’s Law, we will keep you updated on any changes the government makes to employment law to help keep you in the loop, whether you are an employer or an employee.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

We post weekly articles covering a variety of topics, including immigration, property, and more, so be sure to check in regularly.

Contact us if you have any legal questions, and don’t forget to subscribe to our weekly newsletter for the latest updates!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Feel free to contact us for a consultation and to find out how we can help.