13 London Road,
London, SE1 6JZ
020 7928 0276
info@lisaslaw.co.uk

News and Insights

The Health and Care Worker visa allows medical professionals to work in the UK in an eligible job within the NHS, for an NHS supplier, or in adult social care. We have covered the Health and Care Worker Visa in more detail in a recent article specifically about the visa. Click here to read.

 

However, in this article, we have highlighted some of the most common questions we receive in relation to Health and Care Worker visa applications. If you have any further questions about this visa, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with us today.

 

1. Q: Can I take on additional work or a second job?

 

A: Yes, you are. In February 2023, the Home Office removed the 20-hour cap on supplementary work for sponsored workers with a Health and Care Visa. Health and Care Visa holders are now permitted to take on a second, or additional, work or employment while in the UK, provided they continue to work in their sponsored role for their sponsor. If the worker already possesses a Health and Care visa, they will not be required to file for a visa change or notify the Home Office.

 

2. Q: Are care workers eligible for the Health & Care visa?

 

A: It depends. Only workers employed in eligible roles are eligible for the Health and Care visa. Carers were added to the Shortage Occupation List in February 2022, but this status remains subject to government review and change.

 

3. Q: Can I combine other visas to apply for settlement in the UK via a five-year route?

 

A: Health and care workers may be eligible to apply for ILR if they have lived in the UK for five years under this visa or in combination with other permitted work visa categories. You will be able to include time spent with lawful status under any combination of the following visas:

  • Any Tier 1 visa – except Tier 1 (Graduate Entrepreneur)
  • Skilled Worker or Tier 2 (General)
  • Health and Care
  • Scale-up Worker
  • T2 Minister of Religion or Tier 2 (Minister of Religion)
  • International Sportsperson, T2 Sportsperson or Tier 2 (Sportsperson)
  • Innovator
  • Global Talent
  • Representative of an Overseas Business

 

4. Q: Do my dependants need to pay Immigration Health Surcharge?

 

A: No, Health and care workers and their dependants are all exempt from the UK Immigration Health Surcharge.

 

5. Q: How could I know if my salary meets the requirements?

 

A: The standard salary requirement for this visa is at least £26,200 per year or £10.75 per hour. If the ‘going rate’ for your job is higher than both of these, you’ll usually need to be paid at least the going rate. You can check the specific salary requirement for your job by checking your occupation code.

 

6. Q: How can I know if my employer is a UK approved employer for this visa?

 

A: The NHS, organisations providing medical services to the NHS, and organisations providing adult social care are usually approved UK health and care sector employers.

If your employer is not currently approved, they can apply for a sponsor licence if they’re eligible.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

Skilled Worker Visa article

A Health and Care Worker visa allows medical professionals to come to or stay in the UK to do an eligible job with the NHS, an NHS supplier or in adult social care. The Health and Care visa is integrated into the Skilled Worker route.

 

The Health and Care Worker visa allows applicants to benefit from expedited entry, lower visa fees, and specialized support for bringing families to the UK. The UK Health and Care Worker visa holders and their dependants are also exempted from paying the Immigration Health Surcharge (IHS).

 

This guide will briefly explain the general requirements that must be met to apply for Health and Care Worker visa. All requirements must be strictly met otherwise the application will be refused.

 

What are the requirements?

To qualify for a Health and Care Worker visa, you must have a confirmed job offer before your application and:

 

  • be a qualified doctor, nurse, health professional or adult social care professional
  • work in an eligible health or social care job
  • work for a UK employer that’s been approved by the Home Office
  • have a ‘certificate of sponsorship’ from your employer with information about the role you’ve been offered in the UK
  • be paid a minimum salary – how much depends on the type of work you do

 

 

Salary requirements

 

You’ll usually need to be paid at least £20,960 per year or £10.75 per hour. If the ‘going rate’ for your job is higher than both of these, you’ll usually need to be paid at least the going rate.

 

Each occupation code has its own annual going rate. You will need to meet different salary requirements depending on your job.

 

You can be paid between 70% and 90% of the usual going rate for your job if your salary is at least £20,960 per year and you meet one of the following criteria:

 

  • your job is in a shortage occupation
  • you’re under 26, studying or a recent graduate, or in professional training
  • you have a science, technology, engineering or maths (STEM) PhD level qualification that’s relevant to your job (if you have a relevant PhD level qualification in any other subject your salary must be at least £23,580)
  • you have a postdoctoral position in a scientific role

 

Knowledge of English requirements

 

You must prove you have passed an approved English language test with at least CEFR level B1 in reading, writing, speaking and listening, or have an academic qualification that was taught in English and is recognised by UK NARIC as being equivalent to a UK bachelor’s degree, master’s degree or PhD.

 

However, do not need to prove your knowledge of English if you’re a doctor, dentist, nurse or midwife and you’ve already passed an English Language assessment that is accepted by the relevant regulated professional body.

 

You do not need to prove your knowledge of English if you are a national of one of the majority English-speaking countries listed below:

 

 

Maintenance requirements

 

You must have at least £1,270 in your bank account to show you can support yourself in the UK. Your partner and children must have a certain amount of money available to support themselves while they’re in the UK.  The maintenance requirement is £285 for an adult partner, £315 for one child, and £200 for each additional child.

 

You will need to have had the money available for at least 28 days in a row. Day 28 must be within 31 days of applying for this visa.

 

You don’t have to prove you have money to support yourself if:

  • you’ve been in the UK with a valid visa for at least 12 months
  • your employer can cover your costs during your first month in the UK

 

What if you cannot meet all the requirements?

 

It may be possible to still apply for a Health and Care Worker visa if you do not meet all the requirements. Please contact us to find out more information.

 

 

 

Health and Care Worker visa or Skilled Worker visa?

 

Although the Health and Care Worker visa is part of the Skilled Worker route and shares the same standard Skilled Worker application form, there are differences between the Skilled Worker and Health and Care visas.

 

The Skilled Worker visa open to workers in eligible occupations across many areas, whereas the Health and Care Worker Visa is specifically limited to medical professionals and individuals working in eligible health and care roles.

 

If you are not taking up a job role in one of the prescribed occupations for a designated organisation, you will not be eligible for the Health and Care Worker visa, although it remains open to applicants who fall outside the visa requirements to apply under the Skilled Worker visa, provided they meet the visa criteria.

 

Compared to the Skilled Worker visa, the Health and Care route has many advantages over the Skilled Worker route, including faster processing of visa applications, lower application fees and exemption from the Immigration Health Surcharge.

 

What is the Process? 

 

Before you apply, you need to have a job offer from an approved UK employer. You need to ask for the 4-digit occupation code from your employer and check if your job is eligible for this visa. Your employer will assign you a certificate of sponsorship (Cos), which you will need for your visa application.

 

Once you application has been submitted, you will need to book a biometric appointment at a visa centre or enrol your biometrics via an ID app. You will not be able to submit any further documents after your biometrics have been submitted and your application will be under consideration.

 

Presently, the Home Office will take up to 3 weeks from your biometric submission date to decide an application unless there is a delay.

 

There are a number of reasons why an application can be delayed, but most commonly it can failure to provide all the required documentation, and / or the need to attend an in-person interview. Doing everything right in your application increases the chances of the approval of your application within a short waiting time.

 

To help avoid such potential delays, please contact us to assist with your Health and Care Worker visa applications, ensuring that avoidable delays, and refusals are dealt with at the application stage.

 

Health and Care Worker Visa – Granted

 

Should your application be granted you will be granted limited leave to remain for a period depending on your application.

 

You will be eligible to live in the UK within this time. As well as this, you will be able work and take on additional work in certain circumstances and study in the UK.

 

You cannot apply for most benefits (public funds), or the State Pension.

 

Health and Care Worker Visa – Refused

 

You’ll get a letter or an email explaining why your application was refused. Your refusal letter will explain if you have the right to either an administrative review or an immigration decision appeal

 

Extension

 

Once you are granted Health and Care Worker visa, you can extend your visa as many times as you like as long as you still meet the eligibility requirements. You can apply for renewal of your leave to remain 28 days prior to the expiry of your leave to remain.

 

If you change jobs or employer, you will need to apply to update your Health and Care Worker visa.

 

Is fast track available?

 

Please note that Priority Service and Super Priority Service are available for Health and Care Worker visa, where you will receive a decision within 5 working days or the next working day. The Home Office fee is £500.00 for a decision within 5 working days or £1000.00 for a decision on the next working day.

 

Fees

 

When you apply for a Health and Care Worker visa, you and your dependants will need to pay the application fee. You and your dependants are exempt from having to pay the healthcare surcharge.

 

Please note that when applying for entry clearance, the actual fee paid may be higher due to payment being processed in the local currency.

 

When can you apply for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR)?

 

Health and care workers who have lived in the UK for 5 years on the visa, or in combination with other permitted work visa categories, are eligible to apply for settlement (also known as ‘indefinite leave to remain’).

 

Contact us today to start the Health and Care Worker Visa process

 

We at Lisa’s Law regularly assist in applying for Health and Care Worker visa applications both from abroad and within the UK. We will advise and represent you throughout the process. Contact us today to start the process.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

The High Potential Individual visa is dedicated to attracting graduates from leading non-UK universities who have the potential to work in fields such as science, technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship. The aim of this route is to cement the UK’s reputation as a hub for technological advancement by attracting some of the best and brightest from across the world.

 

One of the most attractive elements of the High Potential Individual (HPI) visa is the fact that it allows international graduates to work in the UK without even needing a job offer. It therefore offers an excellent opportunity for international graduates.

 

To be eligible for this route, applicants must have either a bachelor’s or postgraduate degree qualification from one of the top global universities outside the UK. This list is published in the Global Universities List by the Home Office.  It is compiled annually and consists of institutions that are included on an annual top 50 universities list. You can view that list here.

 

How long can I stay?

 

Permission to remain in the UK will be granted for a period of 2 years for applicants who hold a qualification equivalent to a UK Bachelor’s or Master’s level degree. This is increased to 3 years where the applicant holds a qualification equivalent to a UK PhD.

 

Once in the UK, the applicants will be able to freely look for jobs and work for UK companies. Although this route does not lead to settlement, applicants will be able to switch to other types of visas which lead to settlement. This includes the skilled worker visa, scale-up visas and others.

 

In addition, the applicants will also be able to bring their spouse and dependent children with them. Keep reading to learn more about this.

 

How to apply for a High Potential Individual Visa?

 

Like other visas, the HPI visa must be applied for online. However, the way you apply varies depending on whether you are outside the UK or inside the UK.

 

Applying from outside the UK

 

In order to be eligible for applying for a HPI visa, you must apply within five years of being awarded a qualification from one of the universities on the eligibility list.

 

You must also prove your identity and provide supporting documents as part of your application. This will vary based your type of passport and where you are from. Some applicants will have to go to a visa application centre to get a biometric residence permit, while others will be able to use the UK Immigration: ID Check app.

 

When you apply, it will be made clear what you need to do. Following these steps, it will usually take under 3 weeks for you to get a decision.

 

Happy two international students. Graduation Student Commencement University Certificate Success Degree Concept.

 

Switching to a High Potential Individual Visa

 

It may be possible for you to switch to a HPI visa if you’re in the UK and on a different type of visa. However, you cannot apply to switch to this visa if you are in the UK on the following visas:

 

  • Visit visa
  • Short-term student visa
  • Graduate visa
  • Parent of a Child Student visa
  • Seasonal worker visa
  • Domestic worker in a private household visa
  • On immigration bail
  • Because you were given permission to stay outside the immigration rules, for example on compassionate grounds

 

In order to apply for a HPI visa, you must leave the UK if you are on one of the above visas.  You must also ensure that you apply before the expiry of your current visa.

 

Like when you are applying from outside the UK, you must also provide a range of documents such as:

  • a valid passport or other travel document that shows your identity and nationality
  • proof of your knowledge of English

 

You must also pay for Ecctis to check that your qualification is valid. Ecctis will send you a statement once they have checked your qualification which you will also need to provide as part of your application.

 

Finally, depending on our circumstances you may also need to provide:

 

  • Your biometric residence permit (BRP) or online proof of your immigration status
  • Proof of your relationship with your partner or children if they are applying with you
  • And your tuberculosis test results if you are from a listed country. See here.

 

Like if you were applying from outside the UK, you also need to prove your identity if you are switching to a HPI visa.

 

Following the submission of your application, you will usually receive a decision with 8 weeks.

 

Can my partner and children come?

 

Smiling young family sitting in leaves

 

If your partner and children are eligible, they can also apply to join you or stay in the UK as your dependants.

 

A dependent partner may be your spouse, civil partner, or unmarried partner. A dependent children may be your child under 18 or your child over 18 if they are currently in the UK as your dependent.

 

You must however need to prove the following for your partner and/or child respectively

 

Partner:

 

  • You are in a civil partnership/marriage which is recognised in the UK
  • Or, you have been living together in a relationship for at least 2 years when you apply

 

For your child:

 

  • live with you, unless they’re living away from home in full-time education – for example, at boarding school or university
  • not be married or in a civil partnership
  • You’ll need to provide evidence of their address, such as:
  • a bank statement
  • credit card bills
  • driving licence
  • NHS registration document
  • an official letter from their university or college

 

How much does a High Potential Individual Visa cost?

 

The fee for the HPI visa application is £880 as of April 2025. You will also need to pay the healthcare surcharge of £1035 for each year you are in the UK.

 

If you get a job in the public health and care sector sector after you pay the healthcare surcharge then you may be able to get a refund.

 

Finally, if you have been in the UK for less than one year, you will need to show that you have at least £1270 available unless you are exempt. If you have a partner and/or children, they will also need to prove they can support themselves in the UK.

 

If you are looking to apply for a High Potential Individual Visa, don’t hesitate. Contact Lisa’s Law today!

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

By Victor Falcon Mmegwa

 

A report on the Manston immigration centre has seen it be described as “unacceptable” by an independent watchdog that monitors the centre. The Manston immigration centre originally opened in February 2022 to process migrants who arrived in the UK on small boats. It is designed for around 1,000 people to stay for one day.

 

The centre is located on the former Defence Fire Training and Development Centre next to Manston Airport about 20 miles north of Dover. Security, identity, and health checks are conducted on the migrants before they are moved into accommodation. Migrants who do not pass the checks are moved to immigration detention centres.

 

What are the problems with Manston?

 

Representatives from the Independent Monitoring Boards (IMB) made a total of 85 visits in 2022 to three Home Office processing centres for small boat arrivals – Manston, Western Jet Foil and Kent Intake Unit.

 

The IMB report found that each of the centres struggled to cope with an ever-increasing number of arrivals and identified serious concerns about the conditions in which people were being held. This was particularly the case at Manston immigration centre.

 

The report states: “At Manston, detained individuals were accommodated in marquees which we would describe as at best basic, at worst unsanitary and unacceptable.”

 

The local Conservative MP Roger Gale said there were around 4,000 migrants at the centre, which he described as overwhelmed. Despite this, some migrants are having to spend longer at the centre due to a lack of accommodation elsewhere.

 

Last autumn, the UK Health Security Agency warned that accommodation settings should be considered high-risk for infectious diseases. The Home Office suspected that a man’s death at the centre in November could have been caused by a diphtheria infection.

 

“Filthy conditions” at Manston

 

Furthermore, problems included filthy conditions, claims of assaults by guards, drug taking by guards, and the mass dumping at a central London station of asylum seekers who were moved away from Manston.

 

The report also stated that the army was drafted in to help with processing small boat arrivals alongside Home Office officials. Various contractors such as Mitie Care & Custody and Interforce were also used.

 

At first, small boat arrivals were sleeping on gym mats in the Manston marquees. However, the Home Office decided they were a fire risk and removed them, leaving people to sleep on the cold floor with just blankets to lie on. While asylum seekers were supposed to only be held in Manston for 24 hours, many were unlawfully detained there for longer. Indeed, the longest known case was of someone being held there for 43 days.

 

The report highlights problems with clothing. Some asylum seekers had to share coats as there weren’t enough to go around, a practice which the IMB feared could have spread scabies, a disease which was already common on the site. There was also not always suitable clothing available for young children and one instance saw a small child fall over due to wearing oversized clothing. The security guards did not always have suitable clothing and when the weather was cold and wet, they had to wrap themselves in bin bags to protect themselves from the elements.

 

Overcrowding at the Manston immigration centre is in part due to the backlog of asylum claims waiting to be processed, which totals almost 100,000. Whilst a rise in claims since 2019 has contributed to the backlog, a Home Affairs select committee report was published stating that antiquated IT systems, high staff turnover, and too few staff were contributing to the slow processing of claims.

 

Legal advice ignored

 

wrinkled white blanket with soft pillows on comfortable bed in the morning. messed up after nights sleep

 

It has been reported that the Home Secretary Suella Braverman failed to act on legal advice that migrants and asylum seekers were being held at the site for an unlawful amount of time. It was also reported that Braverman had deliberately chosen not to sign off on hotels for Manston detainees to be transferred to in an attempt to reduce the £6.8 million a day government bill. A Home Office spokesperson denied that legal advice given to Braverman was ignored.

 

The Home Office have stated that they are grateful for the important work of the Independent Monitoring Board. Since the report, there have been significant improvements made to the Kent coast short-term holding facilities. This includes the transformation of medical services and facilities and the move to new more suitable accommodation at the Kent Intake Unit. The Home Office have also stated that the health and welfare of people in their care, and individuals working in these facilities, is of the utmost importance.

 

An immigration solicitor’s thoughts

 

Manston immigration centre is a processing centre. Therefore, no one should be held there more than 24 hours. I think the Home Office has broken the law by detaining people for weeks in appalling conditions, as highlighted in this article. More must be done for the necessary checks to be conducted on migrants and more must be done for asylum claims to be processed quickly. This will enable migrants to be moved into accommodation as quickly and safely as possible.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

A recent case gives guidance for the courts on how asylum seekers who arrive in the UK via small boats should be sentenced.

 

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has made ‘stopping the boats’ one of his five key priorities for 2023, but has recently suggested it may not be possible before the next election. The Nationality and Borders Act 2022 was introduced with the primary intention of preventing those who arrive via “irregular” or “unsanctioned” routes from claiming asylum by disqualifying them from consideration as refugees. The starting sentence for such an offence is 12 months’ imprisonment.

 

However, it is important to note that there are now very few safe and legal routes for asylum seekers. This means that many asylum seekers have no route to the UK other than by small boat.

 

What is the background to this case? Keep reading to learn more.

 

Background – R v Ginar [2023]

 

The individual in this case (R v Ginar 2023) is a Turkish national. Ginar travelled to the UK in 2023 hoping to claim asylum following the destruction caused by a major earthquake which destroyed his home. The political situation in the country was also difficult for him and his family.

 

He travelled with more than 50 other foreign nationals across the English Channel by a rigid inflatable boat. It was intercepted by UK Border Force in June 2023 and he was subsequently detained.

 

Following this, Mr Ginar pleaded guilty to contravening section 24 (D1) of the Immigration Act 1971. The amendments to this which Ginar was found in breach of were introduced in the Nationality and Borders Act 2022.  Ginar was reportedly not aware that he was breaking the law and claimed he would not have travelled if he had known. He also claimed he was threatened with death by the people smugglers after seeing how overcrowded and dangerous the boat was.

 

 

Grounds for appeal

 

Mr Ginar was sentenced to 12 months’ imprisonment in August 2023. This was reduced to eight months following his guilty plea. He then applied for permission from the Court of Appeal to appeal his sentence. The basis for this appeal was on two grounds:

 

1. That irrelevant information was treated as an aggravating factor by the sentencing judge

2. That his sentence of 12 months reduced to eight was manifestly excessive

 

Regarding the first ground for appeal, the irrelevant information was the applicant’s immigration history. Mr Ginar had previously been through the UK asylum process in 2005 after being refused leave to enter. Despite his asylum application being refused, and an appeal dismissed, it appears that he stayed in the UK. After another application for leave to remain in 2013 that was refused, he left the UK in November 2015. The argument was made that it was not a criminal offence to enter the UK without valid entry clearance at the time of his previous immigration history.

 

The second ground of appeal relied on Mr Ginar’s first ground. Ginar argued that if the sentencing judge ignored his immigration history, there were no aggravating features in his case.

 

child in a refugee camp behind a wire fence in winter rainy day. holding barbed wire with small hands. knitted gloves white fingers. awaiting release, fence repair in cattle farm, small boy, cold

Decision

 

However, the court refused the appeal. They concluded that there was no arguable ground for challenging the decision or approach made in the sentencing of Mr Ginar. The court held that the aggravating and mitigations factors balanced each other out, leading to the sentence of 12 months.

 

They argued that the offence was aggravated by previous convictions and “a history of unsuccessful applications for leave to enter or remain or for asylum”. Even though the previous attempts did not amount to a criminal offence, the examples of previous failure made the attempt to arrive without valid entry clearance more egregious.

 

It was therefore held that the sentence of 12 months’ imprisonment reduced to eight months following a guilty plea was not ‘manifestly excessive’.

 

Our thoughts

 

The decision made by the Court of Appeal could be said to be a surprising one. Despite this, it does provide clarity on how the courts will approach criminal sentences for those convicted for the offence of arriving in the UK without entry clearance. While the court referred to safer alternative routes being available, as pointed out previously these are not available for the majority of asylum seekers. Instead, this is largely limited to schemes from specific countries. This includes Ukraine and to a lesser extent Afghanistan. Many Afghans continue to arrive via small boat.

 

With reports in the media that convicted criminals may avoid jail from this week because prisons are full, it could be seen as contentious for the government to prioritise the sentencing of asylum seekers who arrive in the UK via small boats.

 

Have questions about this article? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276. Our phone lines are open and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here. 

 

author avatar
James Cook

A local council has ordered developers to demolish two apartment buildings in Woolwich, south-east London.  This follows a breach of planning conditions by the developers in the construction of the Mast Quay Phase II development. According to Greenwich council, there were at least 26 deviations to the plans which were originally approved in 2012.

 

The decision spelled bad news for tenants and developers alike, with many tenants having already moved into the apartments. Following the decision, the tenants in the 204 flats now face the difficult decision of finding somewhere else to live. The Royal Borough of Greenwich has described this as an “unprecedented” decision.

 

In a statement, the developers have subsequently signalled their intention to appeal against the enforcement notice. This case acts as a warning to developers that deviation from original planning permission can prove to be disastrous for developments.

 

Who were the developers involved in the project?

 

Comer Homes Group is a real estate conglomerate founded by two billionaire brothers, Luke Comer and Brian Comer. The group’s UK arm has built a number of new-build property projects in the UK over the years. They mainly develop long-term rental apartment build to rent properties. These property projects are located in London, Hertfordshire, Dorset and the South East.

 

Mast Quay is one of the best-known long-term rental apartment projects developed by Comer Homes Group in the UK. The project received strong support from the local council since its launch, with the Royal Borough of Greenwich believing that the long-term rental apartment project could solve the local housing difficulties, an issue faced by the entire country.

 

In 2017, tenants moved in after the first phase of the Mast Quay development project was completed. Finally, two long-term rental residential buildings in Mast Quay Phase II were officially completed last year.

 

What were the infringements by Comer Homes Group?

 

However, this year, the developer received terrible news. The Royal Borough of Greenwich ordered that Comer Homes Group must immediately demolish the two residential towers, mainly because the two residential towers completely violated planning conditions. There were at least 26 breaches of planning permissions in the two buildings.

 

The visualisations prior to planning permission being granted over a decade ago show a vastly different vision of what was intended for the development. The cabinet member for regeneration, Aidan Smith, has since decreased it as a “mutant development that is a blight on the landscape.”

 

The following is a statement from Greenwich Council:

 

The Royal Borough of Greenwich has taken the decision, as the local planning authority, to progress with enforcement action against the Comer Homes Group’s Mast Quay Phase II development of two residential towers, one of which is stepped, with 23, 11, nine and six storeys, located on Woolwich Church Street, London SE18. 

The Council’s extensive investigation over the last year has concluded that the completed Mast Quay Phase II built-to rent-development has been built without planning permission and is therefore unlawful because it is so substantially different to the scheme that was originally permitted by the planning permission given in 2012.”

 

The 26 deviations to the original planning permission include the following:

 

  • Significant changes to the design of the tower’s exterior
  • The materials and windows appear significantly differently to the original planning application, including: different cladding, less glazing, smaller balconies, smaller windows and no wraparound balconies, resulting in less daylight and sunlight and poorer views
  • The actual area of ​​the two buildings is larger than the originally approved area.
  • No rooftop gardens, children’s play areas, green roofs or landscaped gardens for residents
  • Accommodation quality is lower
  • Apartments are not built as “accessible” so that wheelchair users cannot use their outdoor spaces such as balconies
  • The project provides a residents’ gym in place of an approved commercial building space that is also unsuitable for anyone using a wheelchair
  • Has reduced commercial floor space for ground-level offices, shops and cafes
  • The project failed to provide adequate underground parking, resulting in a predominance of surface parking. This replaces what would have been a landscaped garden area of ​​trees and plants, and an overall reduction in parking, which may put pressure on street parking
  • The project lacks disabled parking spaces
  • The project’s shared residential/commercial basement access could lead to conflicts
  • The project provides access to a poorer quality footbridge to Woolwich Church Street

 

Due to the above problems with the development, the local council believes that the only way to rectify the damage caused by the completed development would be to completely demolish both buildings. The land would be restored to its former condition.

 

The Borough issued an enforcement notice on 25th September. This is subject to appeal rights for a period of at least 28 days.

 

Developers fight back

 

After learning of the news, Comer Homes Group immediately hit back. They announced that they would appeal against the planning enforcement decision and expressed their great disappointment at the council’s move. The developer also accused Greenwich Borough Council of “inaccurate public statements that misrepresent our position and actions”.

 

A spokesman for Comer Homes Group said that the overall development of the Mast Quay project was divided into three development phases. The first phase of the project was completed in 2007 and not subject to any new planning implementation. However, they believe that the council’s assessment of the second stage was harsh, leading to an order for its demolition. The third phase of the project has not yet been built, so it has not been affected.

 

The developers said they applied for planning permission a long time ago. However, many policy changes have occurred over the years, leading them to make changes for some practical reasons. This ultimately meant that completed buildings are different from those originally planned. They had hoped to avoid demolition of the flats by seeking retrospective planning permission.

 

 

What should local tenants do?

 

According to media reports, Phase 2 of the Mast Quay development project already has a total of two new buildings with 204 apartments, most of which are already rented. This means that tenants of these properties must now find new accommodation immediately.

 

The apartments are not cheap, with some tenants paying more than £2000 a month to live in them. Many of the tenants have also signed long-term rental agreements.

 

Some nearby residents have questioned whether it is necessary to demolish all buildings if they are not dangerous given the housing shortage. It is said that more than 20,000 local families are waiting on the borough council’s housing waiting list.

 

Our thoughts

 

This case can remind investors that if you are planning to invest in a long-term rental apartment building project, it is important to do research before investing. This includes checking the qualifications of the developer, whether the property has potential problems, and whether there is protection if problems arise. For example, if they encounter a problem similar to this case, will they have the funds to return it?

 

In addition, before choosing an apartment building, it is best for tenants to choose a property owned by a developer with a good reputation. The most important point is that when you sign the contract, you should read the terms in great detail to see if there is a guarantee of cancellation if something like this goes wrong.

 

If you encounter any difficulties in purchasing a property, please contact Lisa’s Law Solicitors. Our property lawyers have many years of experience in this area and can assist you.

 

Have questions about this article? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, our phone lines are open and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here. 

author avatar
James Cook

In our recent article about the new UK Electronic Travel Authorisation scheme, we mentioned that the EU were planning on introducing a similar system. Now, the details about that scheme, the ETIAS, have been revealed.

 

By acquiring an ETIAS travel authorisation, you will be able to enter these European countries as often as you wish for short term stays. This is usually up to 90 days within any 180 day period.

 

While there has been no specific date announced, the European Travel Information and Authorisation System will be introduced “from 2024”, meaning that there isn’t long until travellers will be required to apply. In total, the number of people from visa exempt countries who will need to apply to travel to an EU country numbers 1.4 billion.

 

The ETIAS is linked to your passport and will remain valid for up to years. However, if your passport expires then you will also need to get a new ETIAS.

 

Which countries require an ETIAS?

 

The scheme will only affect certain travellers planning to travel to one of the thirty European countries (with the exception of Ireland) involved in the scheme.

 

These include the other 26 EU states, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein.

 

Do UK nationals need to apply?

 

As visa exempt nationals, UK citizens will also be required to apply for an ETIAS to visit any of the thirty European countries on the list. If they wish to remain in the EU country, then they must meet the entry requirements following the UK’s exit from the EU.

 

Nevertheless, those UK nationals and their family members who are beneficiaries of the Withdrawal Agreement are exempt from ETIAS. This includes most UK nationals who were living in an EU country before 1st January 2021.

 

These UK nationals should hold documents which prove their status if they wish to live in an EU country and travel to other European countries which require ETIAS.

 

How to apply?

 

The best way to apply for the travel authorisation is via the ETIAS mobile app or the official website. The cost of the ETA will be 7 euros, however those who are over the age of 70 or below the age of 18 will be exempt from paying. Despite this, parents or guardians will still need to complete applications on behalf of minors.

 

While most applications will be processed within minutes, it’s possible that some applications will take as long as four days to be approved. Further, it is possible that the period will be extended by up to 14 days if you are required to provide further information or documents, as well as up to 30 days if you are invited in for an interview. It is therefore imperative that you apply for your ETIAS long before you are due to travel.

 

It’s important to have the following details when you are filling out the application form for an ETIAS.

 

  • Personal information
  • Travel documents such as your passport number
  • Education and occupation
  • Intended travel itinerary
  • Any criminal convictions
  • Past travels to war or conflict zones
  • Whether the applicant has been the subject of a decision requiring them to leave the territory of any country

 

What happens after I apply?

 

Following your application you will receive an email which confirms the application submission as well as your unique ETIAS application number. You should keep hold of this number for future reference.

 

Following the processing of your application, you will receive another email which notifies you of the outcome. As advised above, this usually only takes a few minutes but can take up to 30 days.

 

It is vital that you carry the same passport that you use to apply for an ETIAS with. If you fail to do so, then you will not be allowed to board your mode of transport or enter any of the European countries which require an ETIAS.

 

Can I appeal if refused?

 

If your application is refused, or if your ETIAS travel authorisation is revoked or annulled, you will be notified of the reason for the refusal, as well as the authority that made the decision.

 

Nevertheless, you will be given the right to appeal this decision. The email you receive about the decision will contain the information necessary to appeal, including the European country you should appeal to and the process involved.

 

Have questions about immigration? Contact us today! We will be glad to help.

 

Have questions about this article? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, our phone lines are open and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

Many people will be familiar with the ‘spouse visa’, a type of visa which allows a foreign national to live with their partner in the UK as long as the partner is either British or settled in the UK. However, there is another similar type of visa – the fiance visa. Both visas are separate categories under the broader ‘UK family visa’.

 

The fiance visa is ideal for couples who wish to start a new life together in the UK, but are not yet married or in a civil partnership. However, the fiance visa is just 6 months, and you must prove that you will wed within that period.

 

Although a fiance visa does not directly lead to indefinite leave to remain, the ability to switch to a spouse visa from the fiance visa can put you on the path to citizenship.

 

Keep reading to learn more about the fiance visa.

 

What is the eligibility criteria?

 

The requirements of the fiance visa are very similar to the spouse/partner visa, with two key differences:

 

1. You must prove that any previous marriages or civil partnerships have ended

2. You must also prove that you plan to marry or become civil partners in the next 6 months

 

The remaining requirements are as follows:

 

  • You and your partner must be aged 18 or over when the application is submitted.
  • You and your partner must intend to live together permanently in the UK.
  • The applicant and UK partner must have met in person.
  • Our relationship with your partner must be ‘genuine’ and ‘subsisting’
  • You and your partner are legally married in a marriage that is recognised in the UK;
  • Any previous relationship has broken down permanently
  • You satisfy a financial requirement.
  • You speak and understand English to a required level.
  • There is adequate accommodation for you and any dependents.

 

 

What are the financial requirements?

 

When you make a fiance visa application, you must be able to provide evidence that you will be able to support yourself financially. Firstly, you and your partner must have a combined income of at least £18,600 a year if:

 

  • you’re applying as a partner
  • you want to settle in the UK (get ‘indefinite leave to remain’) within 5 years

 

This increases by £3,800 for your first child, and £2,400 for each subsequent child.

 

There are a number of ways that you can satisfy the financial requirements which include:

 

  • Employment income
  • Self-employment income
  • Savings
  • Investments in stocks and shares
  • Rental income

 

If you are in receipt of certain public funds, you may be able to relay on the adequate maintenance and accommodation alternative to satisfy the financial requirements. Please contact us for more information.

 

What are the costs and the processing times?

 

The cost for a fiance visa is exactly the same as a spouse visa – £1,846. For in-country applications this is £1,048. However, one advantage is that you won’t need to pay the immigration health surcharge while on the fiance visa. However, as it is likely that you will switch to a spouse visa, this will cost £1,560 for an in-country application if you are staying for 2 years and 6 months as of 4th October 2023.

 

While there is no specific timetable for the fiance visa, the processing time for the fiance visa is usually around 2-3 months on average after the application has been received.

 

However, it’s worth bearing in time that should you need your application to be processed faster than usual then you can apply for fiance visa entry clearance through the Home Office priority service. This costs around £500 to £800 but will mean that you will receive a decision within 1 week. Nevertheless, this is not always available depending on the country you live in.

 

What documents are required for a Fiancé Visa?

 

In order to apply for your fiance visa, you will need to provide the following information and evidence for you and any dependents:

 

  • all your names
  • your date of birth
  • your current passport or other valid travel ID
  • copies of the photo page and any visa or entry stamps in your previous passports
  • a copy of your biometric residence permit, if you have one
  • details of any previous immigration applications you’ve made
  • details of any criminal convictions
  • your national insurance number, if you have one
  • your parents’ date of birth and nationality if you’re applying from outside the UK
  • your tuberculosis test results if you’re from a country where you have to take the test
  • certified translation of any document that is not in English or Welsh

 

You will also need to provide to the Home Office that your relationship is genuine and that you intend to marry within six months.

 

Finally, you will need to show that you speak and understand English to the required level to meet this requirement.  You can prove this by passing an approved English language test.

 

You must pass at least level A1 on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) scale for your first visa application. Level A2 if you wish to stay in the UK after your first visa and are intending to apply for a renewal. Level B1 if you are applying for settlement here in the UK.

 

How to switch to the spouse visa?

 

Once you have a fiance visa and are married, you can switch to a UK spouse visa. A spouse visa allows holders to stay in the UK for up to 33 months initially as well as to extend their stay for 30 months further.

 

It is important to make your spouse visa application before your fiance visa expires. If it does expire, you will need to leave the UK and apply for a Spouse visa anew.

 

When applying, you may need to attend both a visa application centre and/or an interview with the Home Office.

 

Contact us today to apply for your fiance visa and begin your new life in the UK!

 

Have questions about this article? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, our phone lines are open and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here. 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

The Migration Advisory Committee has published its 2023 review of the shortage occupation list. Commissioned in August 2022, the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) is an independent non-department public body that advises the government on migration issues.

 

Compared with previous reviews, this review was conducted on the basis of the MAC’s recommendation that employers should not be able to pay below the going rate regardless of whether there is a shortage.

 

Some of the headline recommendations by the MAC are that the shortage occupation list should be abolished and asylum seekers with permission to work should be allowed to work in any role, not just those on the shortage occupation list.

 

Keep reading to learn more.

 

What is the shortage occupation list?

 

The shortage occupation list comprises a list of job roles which are deemed to be in short supply within the UK labour market. The MAC must also deem it sensible for the job roles to be filled by migration. It is a component of the Skilled Worker route, which is the primary immigration route for those who are working in the UK.

 

The roles on the list have a more relaxed criteria for applicants in order to attract talent from abroad, however they are not dealt with any faster than standard Skilled Worker applications.

 

Visa fees for roles on the shortage occupation list are also lower, estimated to be roughly £50 per year by the MAC. The visa fee is reduced by £292 for a 3–5-year visa or £146 for visas lasting up to 3 years. Employers are also allowed to pay the applicant 80% of the going rate, down to a minimum of £20,960.

 

What changes did the Migration Advisory Committee recommend?

 

The Migration Advisory Committee made eight recommendations in total. These were divided into two: recommendations for the role of the shortage occupation list (SOL) in the current immigration system, and recommendations for future SOL reviews.  These recommendations include the following:

 

Recommendations for the role of the SOL in the immigration system

 

1. The SOL going rate discount should be removed and that all occupations on a national pay scale, alongside those where the going rate exceeds the general threshold, be made ineligible for the SOL.

2. If granted the right to work, asylum seekers should be able to work in any job – not just in occupations which are on the SOL.

3. Sponsorship rules for the Creative Worker (CW) visa route be updated, with the reference to the SOL being removed and to allow employers to sponsor any occupation that is currently eligible for the SW route without having to perform a labour market test. They also recommend that the Home Office attach a minimum salary threshold to the CW visa.

 

Recommendations for future SOL reviews

 

1. If the Government opposes allowing low-wage employers to pay below the general threshold for the SW route, the MAC recommend it should either abolish the SOL or heavily reform it to address this issue. They have recommended an alternative approach to the current SOL review process.

2. Should the Government wish to retain a SOL in its current form, they intend to conduct a minor review of the SOL in Spring 2024 – unless otherwise directed by the Government.

3. If the SOL is retained, the MAC suggest that the Government changes the name of the SOL to the Immigration Salary Discount List (ISDL) to correctly reflect its function in the immigration system.

4. The MAC intend not to consider RQF 1-2 occupations as part of minor SOL reviews. They feel that Government should notify them if they would like us to take an alternative approach.

5. The MAC ask the Home Office to provide confirmation by the end of January 2024 that they will move to SOC2020 and update the salary thresholds in line with SOC2020 in the Spring 2024 Immigration Rule changes. If they do not so, the MAC recommend suspending SOL reviews until the switch is made.

 

Following this report by the Migration Advisory Committee, the government will review these recommendations and follow up with a response.

 

Our thoughts

 

Despite the recommendations made by the Migration Advisory Committee, it seems unlikely that most of them will be implemented. The government has taken a firm approach in its approach towards asylum seekers, and it would be surprising if they accepted the recommendation that asylum seekers be allowed to work in any job they wish. While the government has also talked tough on bringing down immigration and prioritising British people, the ability of employers to pay workers 80% of the going rate may potentially undercut British workers while also putting Shortage Occupation List workers in a vulnerable position, a point made by the MAC. Read the full report here for more information.

 

Have questions about this article? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, our phone lines are open and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here. 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

By Yang Peng

 

Relationships in real life are not always stable; there are always ups and downs. Likewise, when applying for a visa, applicants often face challenges in proving the genuineness and enduring nature of their relationships. Consequently, accidental omissions and minor errors may occur in the complex visa application procedure.

 

During the visa application, the Home Office will carefully review the truthfulness of the documents. If any concealed or false information about the application is found, it may have a negative impact on the application and even lead to visa revocation or deprivation of citizenship. It is therefore imperative that you prioritise honesty and accuracy throughout the process.

 

A recent case highlighted the importance of this. On 28th September 2023, The Court of Appeal made a significant decision in an immigration appeal concerning the deprivation of citizenship in which a concealment of a material face was obtained.

 

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the appellant’s appeal from a decision of the Upper Tribunal. It held that the decision of the respondent, the Secretary of State for the Home Department in the appellant’s deprivation of citizenship was correct. It announced that the Home Office could withdraw a person’s citizenship if an applicant conceals essential information regarding their relationship when applying for settlement with their partner.

 

Background of the case

 

Mr A is a Pakistani national and married a Pakistani national, Ms S, before he came to the UK. He arrived in the UK in 2006 and then started a relationship with a Polish national Ms L.

 

Mr A received a divorce deed sent to him by his Pakistani wife, Ms S, in 2008. He then applied for further leave to remain in the UK in 2009 as the extended family member of an EEA national, Ms L. This was based on their durable relationship of two years’ cohabitation. Due to his divorce from his previous marriage and his new relationship with Ms L, Mr A was subsequently granted his further leave to remain and settled in the UK. After completing the five-year qualifying period with the EEA national in 2015, Mr A separated from Ms L in 2016 and applied for British citizenship in 2018.

 

Once Mr A was granted British Citizenship in 2018, he applied for entry clearance for Ms S and their four children to join him in the UK. In this application, he signed the statutory declaration to the effect that the information that he had given was complete and true to the best of his knowledge but made no reference to his relationship with the Polish partner Ms L, or to the Pakistani divorce deed.

 

The Secretary of State for the Home Department (hereafter ‘SSHD’) informed Mr A that there was information confirming that he had obtained his status in the UK as a result of a bigamous marriage. The SSHD ultimately took a decision to deprive Mr A of his citizenship on the basis that Mr A had continued a relationship with Ms S during his relationship with Ms L despite the fact that he was still married to Ms S and that the Pakistani divorce certificate was false.

 

The First-Tier Tribunal (hereafter ‘FTT’) heard Mr Ahmed’s appeal from the SSHD’s decision, and the appeal was dismissed in 2020. Mr A then appealed to Upper Tribunal against the decision of the FTT. The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (UT) found that the decision of the FTT had been wrong in law. The judge concluded that the SSHD had prima facie evidence of fraud. Mr A appealed further.

 

Ahmed v Secretary of State for the Home Department

 

Attorneys in law firms listen to complaints, litigation and provide legal advice to clients.

 

This case mainly discussed that whether the Upper Tribunal made errors in fact and law in finding the SSHD was entitled to deprive Mr A of his British citizenship. There were three main issues that had a significant impact on confirming the key facts in this case. The third issue is particularly valuable as it as it can be referred to for dishonest concealment in immigration application cases:

 

1. Whether the judge misapplied the country guidance to interfere with the finding of facts

2. If the judge was wrong to find that Mr A’s EEA applications would have been refused if continuing relationship with Ms S disclosed

3. Whether the judge was wrong to find dishonest concealment.

 

The court found that there were important inconsistencies in the evidence of Mr A’s witness statements and his relationship with Ms L. The court discerned that there was no basis for interfering with the finding of facts because of the use of the country guidance case law. As a result of these facts, there was also no basis on which to conclude that the judge had made any error.

 

Furthermore, Mr A’s continuing relationship with Ms S, their marriage and their children, were highly relevant to the case, and undermined the prospect of Mr A’s relationship with Ms L being “durable”. If this information about Mr A’s continuing relationship with Ms S had been disclosed, the SSHD would have refused the EEA application.

 

For the third issue about the dishonest concealment, the court held that:

 

  • Although FTT did not expressly say that the concealment was dishonest, FTT had directed that the Secretary of State had to establish that Mr A had obtained citizenship by means of fraud, false representation or concealment of a material fact.
  • Since the Mr A’s credibility had been damaged because of inconsistencies in his evidence, and there had been a plan “all along” to conceal his true relationship with his wife. The divorce deed should be brought into existence in furtherance of a lie. As a result, this was a concealment of a material fact for the purposes of section 40(3) of the 1981 Act.
  • In these circumstances, it is plain that the judge’s findings of fact amounted to a finding of dishonesty on the part of Mr A, so that there was a dishonest concealment of a material fact. The judge was entitled to reach these conclusions and made no significant legal mistakes.

 

The above is a summation of the court’s verdict concerning presented grounds.

 

Why did the appeal against deprivation of citizenship fail?

 

In spouse visa applications which are based on a relationship, it is crucial to establish that the previous relationship has permanently broken down. In Mr A’s initial application, there was an overlap between his two-year cohabitation with Ms L and his previous marriage with Mrs S. Additionally, the birth of his child revealed that he was in a continuous relationship with Mrs S during the five-year relationship with Mrs L.

 

Upon the comprehensive review of Mr. A’s relationship history and the evidence he provided, the court raised substantial doubts about the credibility of Mr. A’s evidence. The court also determined the existence of dishonest concealment and recognized that the divorce agreement should be considered as existence in furtherance of lie. Consequently, the court substantiated the presence of fraud, false representation, and concealment of a material fact within Mr. A’s immigration application. Mr. A’s appeal against deprivation of citizenship was therefore dismissed.

 

Our comments

 

The findings in Ahmed v SSHD highlight the importance of ensuring applications are true. The judgment provides guidance on the grounds of the identification for dishonest concealment as well as the deprivation of British citizenship.

 

This case underscores that any kind of fraud, false representation, or concealment of a material fact in the application could lead to the failure of the application or deprivation of granted immigration status. This could be the case even if you’ve already been granted citizenship. For applicants wishing to apply for a spouse visa or other visas based on a relationship, it’s important to make sure that there is no overlap between the two relationships. Mr A’s situation is a clear reminder that it is important to be honest when submitting an application to avoid legal issues and preserve one’s immigration status.

 

Have questions about this article? Get in touch today!

 

Call us on 020 7928 0276, our phone lines are open and we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Use the Ask Lisa function on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/ask-question/

 

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here. 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

Have a question? Our friendly and experienced team are here to help.

Subscribe to our newsletter

We post weekly articles covering a variety of topics, including immigration, property, and more, so subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.