13 London Road,
London, SE1 6JZ
020 7928 0276
[email protected]

News and Insights

The Home Office recently closed its call for evidence on the establishment of a new Independent Appeals Body, part of wider reforms to the UK asylum system. The deadline, which had been extended to 6 May 2026, has now passed. The responses received will inform the legislation laying the groundwork for the new body, and will support decisions regarding its governance, processes and operational arrangements.

Victor - Namecard

Written by Victor Falcon Mmegwa

 

The plan to replace the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) with a new appeals body was first announced last year. The call for evidence formed a crucial part of that process, seeking insights, expertise and practical experience from practitioners such as Lisa’s Law Solicitors, experts, representative organisations and all those who engage with the appeals system. The evidence gathered will help shape the development of the new Independent Appeals Body and ensure it is designed to meet the needs of those who will rely on it.

 

This Call for Evidence was structured around seven themes where further evidence was considered particularly valuable:

  1. Access to Justice, Fairness and Procedural Safeguards.
  2. Expert Evidence and Country Information.
  3. Adjudicator Recruitment, Eligibility, Impartiality and Training.
  4. Case Management Models.
  5. Hearing Methods, Digital Processes and Efficiency.
  6. Compliance, Engagement, Timeframes and Prioritisation.
  7. Accountability, Transparency and Oversight.

 

The new Independent Appeals Body

The new Independent Appeals Body must be designed to operate effectively within the end to end immigration and asylum system, supporting timely and fair decision-making while upholding individuals’ rights and maintaining the integrity of the system. It will need to provide sufficient capacity to manage demand, with the flexibility to adjust resources as the mix and volume of cases change.

A central requirement is that individuals have access to a fair and effective remedy to challenge the refusal of an immigration and asylum case. In practice, this means ensuring the new Independent Appeals Body:

  • has capacity to dispose of an appeal within a reasonable timeframe;
  • is suitably staffed by professionally trained adjudicators, with safeguards to ensure high standards (decisions on appeals will remain fully independent);
  • enables access to translators and legal advice or representation;
  • can prioritise cases as required by the wider public interest; and
  • can issue final decisions (although the right to apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on points of law will be preserved).

 

The Home Office have stated that the new Independent Appeals Body must comply with the principles of the rule of law, procedural fairness and impartiality. This includes ensuring:

  • all parties are subject to fair, accessible and consistent processes, and are answerable to the same set of processes and laws;
  • parties have equal and effective access to the body, and can effectively navigate the appeals process and resolve disputes; and
  • decision-makers approach each case with an open mind, assess evidence objectively and apply the law without fear or favour.

 

The proposal

The First Tier Tribunal (FTT) currently has an open caseload of 139,000, with means the clearance times of 58 weeks is now nine weeks longer than the same period a year ago. The government’s position is that incremental fixes cannot meet demand.

The new Independent Appeals Body will appoint and train its own cohort of independent adjudicators, with qualification and experience requirements designed to ensure fairness, competence and credibility. While some adjudicators may bring legal expertise, the majority will not need to meet the level of legal training or judicial experience currently expected of the FTT immigration judges.

Although decision-making will be independent, the new Independent Appeals Body must operate in a way that is fully integrated with the end to end immigration and asylum system. This includes maintaining the ability to adjust to peaks and troughs in case intake, supporting a more resilient system overall, and ensuring the appeals process is faster but remains sufficiently robust.

The new Independent Appeals Body will also need to interact efficiently with other parts of the system, including the Home Office decision-making structures and the Upper Tribunal, ensuring a clear route for onward appeal on points of law and supporting streamlined progression of cases across the system.

 

Our thoughts

We welcome the Home Office proposals for an Independent Appeals Body.

Asylum and immigration decisions can involve complex evidence and high stakes such as risk of persecution or family separation. An independent body provides a second look, catching mistakes or misinterpretations made in initial decisions. Therefore, this proposal reduces errors in life-changing decisions

We also believe the new body will bring greater consistency and precedent to how laws are interpreted, leading to more even outcomes over time. Additionally, the knowledge that decisions can be reviewed by an independent body is likely to encourage more careful and thorough initial decision-making by Home Office caseworkers.

Now that the evidence-gathering phase has concluded, we look forward to seeing how the responses – including our own – shape the legislation and operational design of the new body.

In the meantime, we are currently assisting a number of applicants on appeals matters for asylum and immigration cases. Early instruction of a solicitor can make a significant difference, either by increasing the likelihood of a decision being overturned at the initial stages of an appeal or by ensuring your case is thoroughly prepared should the matter proceed to Tribunal.

If you would like to arrange a consultation, please contact our office and we will be pleased to help.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

Call our office on 020 7928 0276, we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

Email us on [email protected].

Or, use the contact form on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/contact/

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

Buying a property at auction can appear deceptively simple: you bid, you win, and you complete. In reality, it is one of the most legally binding and unforgiving ways to acquire property in England and Wales. Once the hammer falls, you are contractually committed – usually with only 28 days (or even less!) to complete and with very limited ability to renegotiate.

This is precisely why instructing a solicitor before an auction purchase is not just advisable, but essential.

Copy of Namecard for article - Jackie in English 1

Written by Jackie Lam, Solicitor

 

The legal pack: where hidden risks sit

Every auction property is sold with a legal pack, typically prepared by the seller’s solicitor. It usually includes the title register, special conditions of sale, searches, leases (if applicable), and replies to enquiries.

However, beneath this routine paperwork often lie the real risks of the transaction.

A solicitor’s role is to carefully review the pack and identify issues that an untrained buyer may miss, such as:

  • Restrictive covenants limiting use or development
  • Title defects or unregistered rights affecting the property
  • Outstanding planning enforcement notices
  • Service charge arrears or significant leasehold liabilities
  • Onerous auction conditions shifting risk to the buyer
  • Missing warranties or documentation for previous works

 

Auction sales operate on the principle of caveat emptor—buyer beware. If a defect exists and is not identified before the auction, the buyer inherits it.

From recent experience, clients often underestimate the importance of this review or are unfamiliar with what “restrictions” or “restrictive covenants” on the title register actually mean in practice. In some cases, these restrictions can significantly limit how a property is used or developed, and may also pose difficulties when it comes to registering your title at HM Land Registry, yet are frequently overlooked at the bidding stage.

 

Why early legal advice matters

Auction timelines are tight, and legal packs are often released only days before the auction. Experienced property solicitors know where to focus quickly and what issues require urgent escalation.

In some cases, once a buyer has entered into an auction contract, the seller or auctioneers may become less responsive—or in some instances, not respond at all—to post-auction queries. This makes it even more important to ensure that you fully understand what you are buying and that key risks are identified and addressed as early as possible, before the bid is made.

Importantly, early legal review may also reveal that a property is too risky or not worth pursuing due to hidden defects or onerous conditions. This can ultimately save buyers from significant financial exposure and unnecessary legal and practical complications in the long run.

For example, a missing planning consent for alterations may seem minor, but can result in enforcement action or unusable space. Similarly, unclear title boundaries can lead to disputes only discovered after completion, when it is too late to withdraw.

 

Auction contracts: fast and final

Once the auctioneer’s gavel falls, a binding contract is formed. There is no cooling-off period. Deposits are payable immediately, and failure to complete usually results in loss of deposit and potential liability for damages.

For this reason, buyers should:

  • Review the legal pack in full before bidding
  • Clarify any missing or unclear documents in advance
  • Understand worst-case financial exposure, not just the purchase price
  • Ensure funding is fully arranged before the auction

 

Conclusion

Buying at auction can offer real opportunities, often below market value, but it comes with heightened legal risk.

A solicitor’s early involvement turns the process from speculative bidding into informed decision-making. The legal pack is not just paperwork – it is the blueprint of your obligations and liabilities.

In auction purchases, the key question is not whether issues exist, but whether they were identified before the hammer fell.

To find out more about the pros and cons of buying a property at auction, see our previous article here.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

Call our office on 020 7928 0276, we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

Email us on [email protected].

Or, use the contact form on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/contact/

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

A closed bank account is stressful. A frozen account can be even worse. For individuals, it can mean being unable to pay rent, bills or everyday expenses. For businesses, it can disrupt wages, suppliers, tax payments and even day-to-day trading.

The UK government’s new “debanking” rules, which came into force from 28 April 2026, are designed to give customers more protection when accounts are closed.

But what do the changes actually mean?

Written by Peggy Lim, Solicitor

 

What is debanking?

“Debanking” is when a bank or payment provider closes someone’s account, or refuses to provide banking services.

This can happen for many reasons. Sometimes the account is inactive. Sometimes a product is withdrawn. In other cases, the bank may have concerns about fraud, financial crime, reputational risk, account activity or commercial reasons.

The issue became widely known after the Nigel Farage and Coutts/NatWest dispute in 2023, which raised a bigger question:

“Can someone lose access to banking because of who they are, what they do, what they believe, or because they are considered too risky or costly to serve?”

But debanking is not only about high-profile cases. Ordinary customers, small businesses, charities and community organisations can also be affected. For many people, the real concern is simple: what do you do if your account is suddenly closed or frozen with little explanation?

 

What is changing?

Under the new rules, customers should usually receive at least 90 days’ notice before their account is closed. They should also receive a clearer written explanation of why the decision has been made.

This does not mean every customer has a right to keep an account forever. Accounts can still be closed for legitimate reasons, including fraud concerns, financial crime risks, misuse of the account or breach of terms.

The change is mainly about fairness and process – more notice, clearer reasons and a better chance to respond.

 

Will customers always be told the full reason?

Not always. There will still be exceptions, especially where fraud, money laundering or sanctions concerns are involved.

In some cases, giving too much detail could interfere with an investigation or breach legal duties. This means that even under the new rules, customers may not always receive a full explanation – particularly where an account has been frozen because of suspected financial crime.

 

What about frozen bank accounts?

The new rules mainly deal with account closures, but many people face a related problem: their account is frozen. A frozen account can be even more urgent. The customer may still technically have the account, but they cannot access their money or use it normally.

This may happen because of fraud alerts, suspicious activity reviews, money laundering concerns, sanctions checks or internal compliance reviews. In these situations, the bank may give very little information. That can be frustrating, but there may be legal reasons for it. If financial crime concerns are involved, the bank may be restricted in what it can say.

 

What we often see in account closure and frozen account cases

Bank account closures and frozen accounts often leave people confused, anxious and unsure what to do next.

For many clients, the hardest part is not just the closure or freeze itself. It is the lack of clear information.

They may not know whether the issue is a routine review, a compliance concern, a fraud alert or something more serious. That uncertainty can be extremely stressful, especially for businesses that rely on the account every day.

The new rules should help in some account closure cases by giving customers more notice and clearer written reasons. However, they will not solve every problem.

Where an account is frozen because of suspected fraud, money laundering, sanctions concerns or another financial crime issue, the bank may still be limited in what it can say. That can make these cases difficult to resolve quickly.

 

What should you do if your account is closed or frozen?

Our advice is to act early. Do not ignore letters, emails or app messages from the bank, even if the explanation is brief or unclear.

Keep a full record of all communications, including screenshots of app messages, letters and emails, call logs, reference numbers and copies of documents sent to the bank.

We also advise clients to gather key documents as soon as possible. These may include proof of identity, proof of address, source of funds, invoices, contracts, payslips, tax records, business accounts or evidence explaining particular transactions.

If the bank’s reasons are unclear, ask for its position in writing. If the decision appears unfair, unexplained or incorrect, consider making a formal complaint. The complaint should explain the impact of the closure or freeze, such as missed payments, business disruption, reputational damage or inability to access essential funds.

If your account is frozen and you cannot access essential money, legal advice may be needed urgently – especially where wages, rent, mortgage payments, tax deadlines, business payments or basic living costs are affected. In some cases, it may also be necessary to ask whether limited access can be given for essential payments while the matter is reviewed.

At the same time, practical steps may be needed, such as opening an alternative account, informing payroll or key payers, updating payment details and protecting business cash flow.

 

How we can help

These cases often involve a difficult balance between the customer’s need to access their money and the bank’s legal duties to prevent fraud and financial crime.

We can help by reviewing the reason given by the bank, preparing a formal complaint, communicating with the bank, responding to information requests, escalating the matter where appropriate and considering whether the case should be referred to the Financial Ombudsman Service or dealt with through other legal routes.

 

Final thoughts

The new rules should make debanking less sudden and less unclear.

They will not stop every account closure, remove financial crime checks or guarantee a full explanation in every case. However, they should give many customers more notice, clearer reasons and more time to protect themselves.

If your bank account has been closed or frozen, do not ignore it. Read the notice carefully, ask questions, keep records and seek advice where needed.

If you are experiencing issues with a bank account closure or frozen account, please get in touch to discuss your options.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

Call our office on 020 7928 0276, we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

Email us on [email protected].

Or, use the contact form on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/contact/

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

The recent High Court decision in Fotheringhame v Nelson [2026] EWHC 632 (Ch) provides an important reminder of how English law determines property rights between cohabiting couples when relationships break down.

It also highlights the legal risks that arise where parties fail to clearly record their respective contributions or ownership intentions at the time of purchase. In such cases, the court may be required to reconstruct ownership based on conduct over time, which can lead to outcomes neither party anticipated.

This article explores the judgment and the key lessons for cohabiting couples seeking to protect their interests in the family home.

Namecard for article - Aurora in English

Written by Aurora Chan, Legal Assistant

 

Background

The case was between an unmarried couple, Fotheringhame and Nelson, who had cohabited for approximately 10 years before separating in 2003. After the separation, Fotheringhame remained living in the family home with the parties’ three children.

The family home was funded using various funds, including a joint mortgage, proceeds from the sale of the previous property (which Fotheringhame’s mother had paid the deposit for), and Fotheringhame’s inheritance from her grandmother. However, the parties had failed to define their respective interests in the property.

Following the separation in 2003, Fotheringhame became solely responsible for all the expenditures related to the property, including mortgage interest repayments, council tax, property maintenance, and buildings insurance. Nelson’s sole contribution was child maintenance payments.

This arrangement continued for many years, during which the parties did not formally discuss or document their interests in the property.

In 2023, Nelson brought a claim under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA) seeking a determination of his beneficial interest in the property and an order for sale.

 

The Legal Position

 

Legal and Beneficial Ownership

In property disputes, it is important to distinguish between the two layers of property ownership:

  1. Legal ownership: refers to whose names are registered on the title at the Land Registry, and thus who has the authority to deal with the property, such as selling or mortgaging it.
  2. Beneficial ownership: refers to who is entitled to benefit from the property, such as the right to live at the property, receive rental income, or receive the proceeds of sale.

 

The two layers of ownership do not always align; even where legal title is held jointly, the beneficial interest may be held in unequal shares, or by different persons altogether.

 

The Default Position

Where:

  • A couple purchases a family home in joint names
  • Both are responsible for any mortgage, and
  • There is no express declaration specifying their beneficial interests

 

Then the presumption (starting point) is that the parties hold both the legal and beneficial ownership jointly and equally.

This reflects the principle that equity follows the law, meaning that beneficial ownership will usually mirror legal ownership unless there is evidence to the contrary.

 

Displacing the Presumption: Common Intention Constructive Trust

This presumption of equal ownership can be displaced if the couple had a common intention, at the time or purchase or later, that the beneficial ownership should be held in unequal shares.

Where there is no direct proof of intention (such as a written agreement), the court can infer the parties’ intentions from their conduct and words. The court will objectively consider what a reasonable person would have understood the intentions to be.

Accordingly, the court will not consider the parties’ uncommunicated or subjective intentions, but how their conduct would reasonably have been interpreted.

 

Determining the Parties’ Shares

If it is determined that the property was not held equally, then the proportions in which the beneficial interest is held must be determined.

This will be assessed be considering the entire course of dealing between the two parties in relation to the property. The court takes a holistic approach considering all relevant factors, including but not limited to financial contributions to the property, to determine the parties’ intentions.

 

The Judgments

 

The First Instance Decision

At first instance, the court held that the parties intended the property to be held equally at the time of purchase. The judge held that Fotheringhame’s inheritance and her mother’s gift were held to be joint contributions for the benefit of both parties rather than being reserved as her separate property. This was because the funds had been applied towards the purchase of the family home, which the court held to be indicative of an intention to share the asset jointly.

Following separation, the court found that the parties’ common intention had changed. This was evidenced by Nelson ceasing to make any financial contributions towards the property and vacating the home, while Fotheringhame remained in occupation and solely met all ongoing expenses, including mortgage interest, council tax, and maintenance costs.

On this basis, the judge concluded that the parties’ beneficial interests had shifted over time, and determined the final shares to be 80.7% to Fotheringhame and 19.3% to Nelson, reflecting the parties’ respective contributions and overall course of dealing.

Fotheringhame was given the opportunity to buy out Nelson, or otherwise the property would be sold the proceeds divided accordingly.

Fotheringhame was dissatisfied with the outcome as she had argued for a 95/5 division. She applied for an appeal on the basis that the judge had failed to properly consider her contributions and had mischaracterised her case.

 

The High Court Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal on both grounds and upheld the first instance judge. The High Court held that, though the trial judge’s reasoning could have been expressed more clearly, he had correctly understood and applied the legal principles. He had also duly considered all the relevant factors, including Fotheringhame’s mortgage, insurance, repairs and council tax payments. No material error in the evaluative judgment was demonstrated which would change the outcome.

he High Court further confirmed that where a common intention cannot be directly evidenced, it is permissible to impute an intention to the parties in order to determine their respective shares.

The court also reiterated that determining beneficial interests is not a purely arithmetical exercise based solely on financial inputs. Instead, it requires a broad evaluative assessment of the parties’ entire course of dealing in relation to the property.

Although Fotheringhame sought a strict calculation based on her financial contributions, the court noted that, when properly assessed (including Nelson’s child-related contributions), his effective contribution was 28.6%, which exceeded the share he had been awarded. The court observed that Fotheringhame therefore risked a less favourable outcome as a result of pursuing the appeal.

 

The Implications and Takeaways

 

Be aware of the limitations of cohabitation rights

Unlike other jurisdictions, England and Wales has no concept of “common law marriage” despite the widespread misconception. Cohabitating couples do not acquire automatic rights like married couples do.

In the event of separation, cohabitants cannot rely on the holistic, fairness-based regime available to married couples under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. Instead, property disputes are determined under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA).

As illustrated in this case, the court is confined only to considering the parties’ conduct and intentions in relation the property, rather than a comprehensive view of their entire relationship. They were also unable to carry out a broad redistribution of assets, as would be possible in divorce proceedings.

Therefore, it is important that cohabitants take proactive action to define and protect their financial positions.

 

Drafting cohabitation and separation agreements

Cohabitation agreements allow couples to regulate their financial arrangements during the relationship. These agreements can address:

  • ownership of property;
  • responsibility for mortgage and household expenses; or
  • treatment of savings, debts, and other assets.

 

Where a relationship has already broken down, a separation agreement can record how assets, liabilities, and practical arrangements are to be resolved, enabling both parties to move forward with greater certainty.

While such agreements are not automatically binding, they are highly persuasive if properly drafted, entered into freely, and supported by independent legal advice.

 

Setting up Declarations of Trust

Where a property is purchased jointly, a declaration of trust is the most effective way to record the parties’ beneficial interests, especially where the property is not held in equal proportions as tenants in common.

This document can specify:

  • the proportions in which the property is owned (e.g. 80/20);
  • how sale proceeds are to be divided;  or
  • how contributions are to be treated over time.

 

This ensures that the property is held by the parties as they intended and according to their wishes.

Without a declaration of trust, the court may have to infer or impute the parties’ intentions based on their conduct, which introduces uncertainty and the risk of litigation.

 

Clearly define gifts or inheritance

This case highlights the risk that gifts and inheritance may be treated as joint contributions if they are used for the benefit of the relationship, such as funding the family home.

To avoid this:

  • clearly document the intended ownership of the funds;
  • record contributions in a declaration of trust where they are used to purchase property;
  • consider using a cohabitation or nuptial agreement; and
  • keep such funds ringfenced, rather than mixing them with joint finances.

 

Failing to do so may result in the court treating what was intended as a personal contribution as part of the parties’ shared assets.

 

How We Can Help

We can help individuals and couples to protect their financial interests whether they are cohabitating or married or in a civil partnership. We can assist at any point whether at the outset of the relationship or upon separation. Our services include:

  • Tailored advice on cohabitation rights or marriage rights
  • Consultation on safeguarding financial interests in a relationship
  • Drafting cohabitation, separation or nuptial agreements to clearly regulate financial arrangements
  • Preparing declarations of trust to accurately record ownership of property

 

Find out more on our family law page or contact us today.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

Call our office on 020 7928 0276, we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

Email us on [email protected].

Or, use the contact form on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/contact/

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

From 8 April 2026, updated Home Office sponsor guidance has significantly widened the scope of right to work checks. Introduced without prior notice, the changes impose broader compliance duties on sponsors and raise immediate concerns for many businesses.

Namecard for article - Angel Wan in English

Written by Angel Wan, Solicitor

 

Wider Obligations, Greater Uncertainty

Sponsors must now verify that anyone they intend to sponsor, employ, or “directly engage” has valid permission to work in the UK before work begins. This applies even where an individual appears to be a British citizen or otherwise settled. Failure to carry out checks can result in civil penalties and the loss of a sponsor licence.

The key issue is uncertainty. The term “directly engage” is not defined, leaving employers unclear about how far their responsibilities extend. A cautious approach suggests checks may now be required for individuals beyond traditional employees, such as contractors, LLP members, and zero-hours workers.

These changes go further than the current right to work regime and appear to anticipate a broader enforcement framework that has been legislated but not yet implemented. Their early introduction, before consultation has concluded and without a transition period, has made compliance more challenging, particularly for organisations with complex or flexible workforce structures.

 

Conclusion

This update marks a notable expansion of sponsor duties, combined with limited clarity on how to comply. Businesses should act promptly by reviewing their right to work procedures and considering whether checks need to be extended to non-employee workers.

In our view, a cautious and proactive approach is essential. Until further guidance is issued, sponsors should prioritise risk management, maintain clear records, and seek advice where needed to avoid potential penalties or licence revocation.

Lisa’s Law have extensive expertise when it comes to providing support for businesses attempting to adhere to their sponsor obligations. Find out more about our corporate immigration services here.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

Call our office on 020 7928 0276, we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

Email us on [email protected].

Or, use the contact form on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/contact/

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

Lisa’s Law staff and business partners alike recently gathered for our Spring Social at Puttshack Bank for an evening of fun, food and networking.

As a thriving firm which continues to expand, the importance of coming together several times a year outside of work plays an important role in the work calendar. At a growing firm with both office-based and remote colleagues, events like this give us the opportunity to reconnect and strengthen relationships that the pace of a busy London law firm doesn’t always allow.

We were also delighted to invite a number of our valued business partners to join us for the evening, providing a great opportunity to connect, exchange ideas and strengthen our ongoing collaborations in a relaxed and informal setting. It was fantastic to see such positive engagement across colleagues and partners alike.

 

People stand in groups chatting in a dim bar/club setting, with warm lighting and a red-tiled wall in the background.

 

As we arrived, tables of pizza, various hors d’oeuvres, and drinks were laid out on tables in our own private area while staff and business partners mingled, before splitting off into small groups for some golfing fun with a twist.

 

Wine bottles chilling in a metal ice bucket with two glasses of red wine on a white napkin atop a wooden table.

Pepperoni pizzas on a metal tray in a dim restaurant, with a wooden stand and warm lighting.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instead of one hole as you might expect, there were instead multiple, providing opportunities for bonus points for those willing to take riskier shots, as well as hazard holes which deducted points from your score. Ball-tracking removed the need for pen and paper, while live scoreboards allowed us to follow our scores from hole to hole. This heightened the competitive, but relaxed spirit of the event, with plenty of friendly rivalry developing along the way.

 

Man in a dark shirt bends to play a tabletop game labeled TRUE/FALSE while a group of adults watches in a colorful arcade-like room with drinks in hand.

 

Group of people standing along a railing in a dim indoor space, some pointing toward something off-screen.

 

This element of both skill and randomness provided plenty of unexpected moments, making it the perfect way to unwind and spend time together outside the office.

Events like this are an important part of life at Lisa’s Law, helping to strengthen the relationships and team spirit that sit at the heart of our growing firm. We’re already looking forward to our next event this summer.

Have questions? Get in touch today!

Call our office on 020 7928 0276, we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

Email us on [email protected].

Or, use the contact form on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/contact/

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

In property transactions, one of the most important professional obligations is the duty to avoid conflicts of interest. Clients often ask why a single solicitor cannot act for both the buyer and the seller in the same transaction. The reason is simple: the buyer wants the lowest price and the most favourable terms, while the seller aims for the highest price, minimal delay, and the fewest liabilities. Because their interests are inherently opposed, a conveyancer will usually be unable to act for both parties in the same property transaction.

 

Namecard for article - Lok in English

A conflict of interest arises when a solicitor cannot act in the best interests of one client without adversely affecting the interests of the other. In conveyancing, this can happen very easily, because the parties are effectively negotiating against each other, even when both are motivated to complete the transaction smoothly.

The Law Society guidance highlights the high risk of conflict when acting for both buyer and seller, and the usual “substantially common interest” exception does not apply to a typical property purchase. While both parties share the overall aim of completing the transaction, their legal interests remain opposed. Some firms may be able to act for both parties in very limited circumstances, but only if strict regulatory conditions are met, including the absence of any conflict, proper safeguards, and informed written consent. In standard residential conveyancing, this is uncommon.

 

The differing positions of buyers and sellers

Even where both parties are amicable and cooperative, their legal positions remain distinct. A seller may wish to keep replies to enquiries brief and avoid giving warranties, while a buyer will require full disclosure and strong legal safeguards before proceeding. For this reason, the issue is not confined to actual disputes; a potential conflict is sufficient. If there is a realistic possibility that a solicitor may need to prioritise one client’s interests over the other’s, they should not act for both.

Confidentiality is another key concern. Clients often share sensitive information with their solicitor, such as financial limits, urgency to complete, or negotiating flexibility. A solicitor acting for both parties would face an impossible situation –  unable to disclose this information to the other side, yet inevitably influenced by it. These risks undermine trust and fairness, and could expose the firm to complaints or legal claims.

Using separate solicitors does not make the transaction adversarial; it simply ensures that each party has independent legal representation. The buyer can receive clear, impartial advice on risks, searches, and contract terms, while the seller is advised independently on how best to protect their own interests.

 

Final thoughts

In summary, the prohibition on acting for both buyer and seller is designed to protect both parties, ensure a fair transaction, and uphold professional standards. In most everyday property sales, each party should have their own conveyancer.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

Call our office on 020 7928 0276, we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

Email us on [email protected].

Or, use the contact form on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/contact/

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

 

author avatar
James Cook

Going on holiday should be a time to relax. But when something goes wrong abroad, it can quickly become stressful and confusing. Many travellers are unsure what rights they have, especially when they are outside the UK.

Whether it is a cancelled booking, unsafe accommodation, lost luggage, or even an incident involving local authorities, it is important to understand where you stand.

White Namecard for article - Paul in English (1)

Written by Paul Cheuk, Solicitor

 

You might think the biggest risk on holiday is a delayed flight or a disappointing hotel. But recent reports suggest it can be far more serious. More than 1,700 British travellers have reportedly taken legal action after falling ill on package holidays in Cape Verde. Some cases involved infections such as salmonella and E coli, and a number of incidents have been reported as very serious.

It is a reminder that things can go wrong quickly when you are abroad, and not always in ways you expect. Whether it is a cancelled booking, unsafe accommodation, lost luggage, or even an incident involving local authorities, it is important to understand where you stand.

 

Package Holiday or Independent Travel

First and foremost, your rights may depend on how and where you booked your trip.

If you booked a package holiday through a UK travel company, you have stronger protection under UK law. This is mainly governed by the Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018. Under these rules, the travel company is responsible for the services provided, such as flights, hotel, and transfers. If something goes wrong, you may be able to claim compensation directly from the company in the UK, even if the problem happened abroad.

In addition to traditional travel agencies, many packages offered directly by airlines or hotel websites will also fall within these rules if they include more than one service sold together for a single price. If you are unsure whether your booking is covered by the Regulations, you should consider seeking legal advice.

If you booked everything separately, your protection is more limited. You may need to deal with foreign providers directly, which can be more difficult.

This type of situation also highlights why package holiday protection is important. Where a trip is booked as a package, the travel company may be responsible if the accommodation or services fall below reasonable standards, including cases involving illness linked to the hotel environment.

 

When Things Go Wrong Abroad

There are many common problems that travellers face. These include situations where the hotel does not match what was promised, where conditions are poor or unsafe, where excursions are cancelled or badly managed, or where there are accidents or transport delays.

A high-profile personal injury claim was recently launched against the travel company Tui, with over 1700 people joining the legal action as of April 2026 after becoming ill on holiday in the Cape Verde islands. The claim is being led by lawyers from Irwin Mitchell, who believe at least eight Britons have died on holiday there. The BBC has obtained footage showing what appears to be undercooked food, buffets surrounded by flies as well as mould in hotel rooms.

While Irwin Mitchell have set out their intentions to resolve their cases with Tui amicably, they expect a High Court judge to make an order involving millions of pounds in payments of damages to Irwin Mitchell’s clients.

These recent large scale claims involving illness outbreaks at Cape Verde show that issues such as food hygiene, hotel standards, and health risks are not just minor inconveniences. They can lead to serious consequences if not handled properly.

If something happens, it is important to act early. You should report the issue to the hotel, tour operator, or local representative straight away. You should also take photos, keep receipts, and make a record of what happened. This evidence can be important later.

 

Dealing With Authorities Overseas

In more serious situations, such as illness, accidents, or disputes with hotels or tour operators, you may need to deal with local police or officials. This can feel unfamiliar and intimidating, especially if events escalate quickly while you are still trying to understand what has happened. It is important to remember that local laws apply, not UK law. Language differences can lead to misunderstandings, and anything you say may be recorded or used later.

If you are asked to give a statement or attend an interview, you should stay calm and seek advice if possible. You should not feel pressured to sign documents that you do not understand.

While UK lawyers may not be able to advise directly on foreign law, you should not hesitate to contact one. They can act as your first point of contact, help you understand the situation, and, where needed, refer you to appropriate local lawyers.

 

Medical Emergencies and Insurance

If you are injured or become ill abroad, your travel insurance is essential. Without insurance, medical bills abroad can be very high. It can cover treatment costs, hospital stays, and even emergency return to the UK.

Always contact your insurer as soon as possible. They may guide you on where to go for treatment and what costs are covered.

However, you should also be careful during the claims process. If the insurer starts asking detailed questions or carries out a longer investigation, it may be wise to seek legal advice. Providing incomplete or unclear information could lead to a refusal of coverage. Having a lawyer review your situation at an early stage can help avoid this risk.

 

Final Thoughts

Being abroad does not mean you have no rights. But it does mean things can be more complicated. The key is to stay calm, gather evidence, and avoid making rushed decisions.

At Lisa’s Law, we advise clients on disputes arising from holidays and travel issues, including matters that involve foreign providers or incidents overseas. If something has gone wrong on your trip, we can help you understand your options and what steps to take next.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

Call our office on 020 7928 0276, we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

Email us on [email protected].

Or, use the contact form on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/contact/

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

Significant increases in service charges are no longer unusual. What is increasingly concerning, however, is not the level of the increase itself, but the lack of substantiation behind it. Leaseholders are frequently presented with sharply higher demands, supported by little more than broad assertions about rising costs or “necessary works,” with no meaningful documentary evidence.

White Namecard for article - Frankie in English

Written by Frankie Ng, Litigation Supervisor

From a litigation perspective, this is where the issue crystallises. The question is not simply whether a landlord is entitled to incur expenditure, but whether they can prove that the sums demanded are properly recoverable.

The legal framework is often misunderstood by managing agents. Under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, service charges are only payable to the extent that they are reasonably incurred and relate to works or services carried out to a reasonable standard. This is not a technicality. It is a statutory control on recovery. In practice, it imposes an evidential burden on the landlord or management company to justify what is being charged.

In many disputes, that burden is not met.

 

Shifting the dynamic away from the landlord

It is not uncommon to see demands issued without a clear breakdown, supported by incomplete accounts, or based on anticipated rather than actual expenditure. In some cases, key documents – contracts, invoices, or tendering records – are either missing or never properly obtained. From a contentious standpoint, these gaps are not minor defects; they go directly to enforceability.

Leaseholders are not passive recipients in this process and do have the ability to challenge service charges. The statutory rights to request summaries of costs and inspect supporting documentation are often the first step in shifting the dynamic. Once exercised properly, they force the landlord to move from assertion to evidence. Where that evidence is lacking, the strength of the landlord’s position deteriorates rapidly.

A further pressure point arises in the context of major works. The consultation requirements are frequently treated as a procedural formality, but failures in compliance can have substantive consequences. In litigation, defects in consultation are often deployed not merely as technical breaches, but as a basis to challenge the recoverability of significant elements of the claimed sums.

 

What role can the courts play?

Where matters escalate, the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) becomes the central forum. Importantly, proceedings before the Tribunal are not limited to defensive action. Leaseholders can take the initiative and seek a determination on liability and reasonableness before any enforcement steps are taken. This is often a strategically advantageous position, particularly where the landlord’s evidential case is weak.

The courts have also made clear that reliance on lease wording alone is insufficient. In London Borough of Hounslow v Waaler [2017] EWCA Civ 45, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exercise of a landlord’s discretion must itself be reasonable. This includes consideration of the financial impact on leaseholders and whether alternative, less expensive options were available. The decision is frequently relied upon in disputes where the scale of expenditure appears disproportionate to the benefit obtained.

In practice, many service charge disputes are won or lost well before any hearing. Early, focused engagement – particularly requests for underlying documents and targeted challenges to specific heads of cost—can expose weaknesses in the landlord’s position. In our experience, once a landlord is required to justify its figures in detail, it is not uncommon for positions to soften or for substantial reductions to be negotiated.

What distinguishes a routine complaint from a viable claim is evidence. A substantial increase, without substantiation, is not simply frustrating; it is often legally vulnerable.

If you are facing a significant increase in service charges and have not been provided with clear and adequate supporting documentation, it is important to consider your position at an early stage. These disputes are rarely resolved by accepting the demand at face value, and delay can weaken your strategic options.

 

How can our litigation team help?

Our litigation team regularly advises leaseholders on challenging service charges, from initial investigation through to representation before the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber). We focus on identifying evidential weaknesses, applying pressure at the right stage, and achieving commercially sensible outcomes.

If you would like to discuss a potential challenge or review your current position, please get in touch.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

Call our office on 020 7928 0276, we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

Email us on [email protected].

Or, use the contact form on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/contact/

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

It has long been the case that a child born in the United Kingdom who has lived here continuously for at least seven years can apply for indefinite leave to remain (ILR) on the basis that their private life is engaged under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Once that child secures ILR, it has been regular practice for their parents to make linked applications for leave to remain on the strength of the child’s established life in this country. For many years, these applications were routinely granted, reflecting the strong weight given to a child’s integration and the disruption that removal would cause.

Copy of Namecard for article - Mahfuz in English

Written by Mahfuz Ahmed, Immigration Supervisor

 

Legal Framework

The legal framework underpinning these applications is clear and long-established. Under the Immigration Rules, specifically Appendix Private Life (which replaced the former paragraph 276ADE(1)(iv)), a child under the age of 18 who has lived continuously in the UK for at least seven years may qualify for settlement where it would not be reasonable to expect them to leave the UK. This rule gives effect to the UK’s obligations under Article 8 ECHR, which protects the right to respect for private and family life. In addition, section 55 of the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 imposes a statutory duty on the Home Office to safeguard and promote the welfare of children in the UK when making immigration decisions.

The best interests of the child must be treated as a primary consideration. In practice, this has meant that decision-makers are required to carry out an individualised assessment of the child’s integration into UK society, including their schooling, friendships, language, cultural ties, and the likely impact of relocation rather than applying a blanket approach based solely on the parents’ immigration status.

 

Why Applications Are Being Refused – and How We Handle It

In recent months, however, we have received a number of decisions that are causing real concern. Applications for child ILR that would previously have succeeded are now being refused. The Home Office is citing the fact that the parents themselves do not have leave to remain and concluding that it is therefore “reasonable” to expect the child to leave the UK with them. Despite the child having been born here and having known no other home for seven years or more, the refusal letters are effectively treating the parents’ immigration status as decisive. We have already lodged appeals in several of these cases and are preparing more.

These appeals will require a robust evidential bundle. We must demonstrate both the child’s deep integration into life in the United Kingdom and the very real impact that relocation would have. This means presenting clear subjective evidence, school reports, letters from teachers, evidence of friendships, extracurricular activities, medical records, and anything else that shows how firmly the child is rooted here alongside objective evidence. Potentially independent social work or psychological reports addressing the emotional and developmental consequences of a sudden change in environment, language barriers, and disruption to education are now essential. The Home Office is no longer prepared to accept the child’s seven years of residence at face value; we have to prove why departure would be unreasonable in the specific circumstances of the case.

This shift makes it more important than ever that families seek legal advice at the earliest opportunity. A comprehensive, well-prepared application can still succeed, but it must be put together with care and with full awareness that the matter may have to proceed to appeal. Attempting these applications without proper legal representation risks missing critical evidence or arguments that could make the difference between success and refusal.

 

My Thoughts – Why We Believe This Approach Is Unlawful

We believe the current approach being taken by the Home Office is unreasonable. The vast majority of children who qualify under this route have parents who are overstayers or whose own leave has expired. That has always been the reality of these cases. It is difficult to see how the parents’ circumstances can be used to disengage the child’s fundamental rights under Article 8. The child’s private life, their schooling, their friendships, their sense of belonging to the only country they have ever known exists independently of the parents’ immigration history. To treat the two as automatically interchangeable overlooks the individual assessment that both Article 8 and section 55 of the 2009 Act require.

If your child was born in the UK and has now lived here for seven years or longer, we strongly recommend that you obtain legal advice before making any application. The landscape has changed, and the stakes are high. A well-evidenced case, prepared with the possibility of an appeal in mind, remains the best way forward.

We are currently assisting a number of families in exactly this situation and would be happy to discuss your circumstances. Early instruction of a solicitor can make a significant difference both to the quality of the initial application and to your position if the matter has to go before the Tribunal.

If you would like to arrange a consultation, please contact our office and we will be pleased to help.

 

Have questions? Get in touch today!

Call our office on 020 7928 0276, we will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

Email us on [email protected].

Or, use the contact form on our website. Simply enter your details and leave a message, we will get right back to you: https://lisaslaw.co.uk/contact/

For more updates, follow us on our social media platforms! You can find them all on our Linktree right here.

author avatar
James Cook

Have a question? Our friendly and experienced team are here to help.

Subscribe to our newsletter

We post weekly articles covering a variety of topics, including immigration, property, and more, so subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates. 

Subscribe Newsletter Blog Sidebar

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Untitled(Required)