13 London Road,
London, SE1 6JZ
020 7928 0276
info@lisaslaw.co.uk

News and Insights

Written by Caryn Toh.

 

 

The Court of Appeal raised the issues of the gaps in 10 years continuous lawful residence applications in the case of Hoque & Ors v SSHD [2020] EWCA Civ 1357 on 23rd October 2020. It considered whether unlawful residence which was followed by grant of lawful residence (“book-ended gap” as it was called in the case) should be treated differently from that which was not (“open-ended gap”).

 

Before looking into the aforementioned recent case law, let’s look into the definition:

 

What is continuous Lawful Residence?

 

“Lawful residence” is defined under Paragraph 276A(b) of the Immigration rules as follows:

 

  • existing leave to enter or remain; or

 

  • (temporary admission within section 11 of the 1971 Act (as previously in force), or immigration bail within section 11 of the 1971 Act, where leave to enter or remain is subsequently granted; or

 

  • an exemption from immigration control, including where an exemption ceases to apply if it is immediately followed by a grant of leave to enter or remain.

 

ILR will be available for those who have satisfied ten years continuous lawful residence in the UK and satisfied other requirements listed under Paragraph 276B of the Immigration Rules.

 

Backgrounds and Issues

 

There are five applications for permissions to appeal (two of them are in the same case) and the court granted permission to appeal on three of the applications, which in turn raised two issues.

 

The four appellants from separate cases had all come to the UK with leave to enter as students and were subsequently granted successive further limited periods of leave to remain. Three of the appellants claimed to be entitled to ILR on the basis of long residence.

 

Their applications for further leave to remain were refused, as were their appeals against the refusals, at which point they became overstayers in the UK. However, the three appellants subsequently made further applications for leave to remain within the time periods prescribed by para 39E of the UK’s Immigration Rules, with the headings of ‘Exceptions for overstayers’.

 

The three appellants later varied their applications that were pending to ILR applications based on their upcoming ten years of residence in the UK. An applicant that has a pending application for leave to remain on one basis is allowed to make a further application on a different basis, which is treated as a variation of the original application: see JH (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 78.

 

The applications were pending until they have reached  the 10th year of their stay in the UK. However, the applications were refused by the Respondent on the basis that they had not been in the UK for 10 years continuous lawful residence as per 276B(i)(a) of the Rules.

 

The appellants argued that the requirement in para 276B(i)(a) was qualified by para 276B(v) of the Immigration Rules, which provided that ILR applicants must not have been in the UK in breach of immigration rules, but provided an exception that ‘any current period of overstaying’ would be disregarded if para 39E of the Rules applied, and the appellants argues that they fell within the scope of that exception.

 

It was claimed that the their period of overstaying should be disregarded and have therefore accumulated 10 years “continuous lawful residence. Additionally, the appellants also contended that the refusal of the ILR applications was in breach of their Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”).

 

Decisions

 

None of the appellants met the requirements pursuant to para 276B for the grant of ILR and the appeal would be dismissed. Lastly, little weight should be given to a private life established by a person at a time when the person’s immigration status is ‘precarious’ in accordance to the public interest considerations applicable in all cases under s117B(5) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. It is concluded that the appellants are unlikely to be granted leave to remain when the requirements are not met, but had instead relied on art 8 ECHR. [see 53 – 58 of the judgment].

 

In short, the Court of Appeal found that the requirement for ILR applicants to have 10 years’ continuous lawful residence in the UK was not qualified by a subsequent requirement in the UK’s Immigration Rules that ‘any current period of overstaying’ would be disregarded in certain circumstances.

 

The Court of Appeal has ruled that the any period of overstaying and the grace period of 14 days provided under Paragraph 39E of the Immigration Rules headed “Exception for overstayers” will not be applicable or counted as lawful if the Applicant has not accumulated at least 10 years lawful residence for the purpose of paragraph 276B(i)(a) of the Immigration Rule at the time of their ILR application under Paragraph 276B of the Immigration Rules.

 

 

Thoughts

 

What is interesting is however there are some instances where any overstaying permitted (Book-ended gaps) under Para 39E will be treated as lawful residence if it falls between previous period of lawful residence. This can be referred to in para 50 of the judgement.

 

It is worth mentioning however that the Court of Appeal “do not regard it as unreasonable or disproportionate for the Secretary of State to treat book-ended and open-ended overstaying differently”. The case of open-ended overstaying is not permitted under Para 39 E because there will have been no grant of leave on the original application.

 

In conclusion, the Court of Appeal has confirmed that the appellants that have open-ended gaps are not to rely on the provision under Paragraph 39E to extend the lawful residence in order to meet the 10 years continuous lawful residence criteria.

 

 

Have questions? We are here for you!

 

In the meantime, we are operating as usual, and you can reach us on 020 7928 0276 or email in to info@lisaslaw.co.uk for any questions you may have on this topic.

 

Or, why not download our free app today? You can launch a new enquiry, scan over documents and much more.

 

If you have an iPhone, follow this link to download.

 

If you use an Android phone, follow this link to download. 

 

Find the link here if you need some further instructions on how to use our new app!

 

 

 

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

Domestic abuse has unfortunately been on the rise since national lockdowns became part of life. People are forced to remain indoors most of the day when in some cases their home is the most dangerous place for them. This terrible crime destroys families and ruins lives. Measures must be taken to put an end to it and to support people who are victim to it.

 

The Family Justice Council has published new guidance titled ‘Safety from Domestic Abuse and Special Measures in Remote and Hybrid Hearings’. This guidance aims to identify situations in which careful consideration must be given and where special measures are required in terms of how hybrid/remote hearings should be facilitated to safeguard vulnerable parties. Such measures include proactive advance planning of hearings, consideration of risks involved and practical support to ensure physical and emotional safety of all participants and provides a checklist of those considerations to make sure nothing is missed out.

 

So, what does the guidance say? Firstly let’s look at the checklist of considerations for proceedings in which domestic abuse is an issue:

 

  • In what environment will the victim be appearing?

 

  • In what environment will the victim be preparing themselves for and dealing with the aftermath of the hearing?

 

  • What will be visible to the court and any other participant in the proceedings? What will be visible to the victim?

 

  • What kind of environment and level of visibility is necessary in order to ensure physical and emotional safety for the victim and any children involved?

 

  • What kind of environment and level of visibility is necessary to enable the victim to give their best evidence?

 

  • What kind of environment is necessary to enable the victim to prepare themselves mentally and emotionally for the hearing and to cope after the hearing?

 

  • What kind of environment is necessary for the court to deal justly with the case having regard to any welfare issues involved?

 

Initial hearing arrangements

 

It is advised that victims of domestic abuse are first consulted regarding the manner in which they wish to take part in the hearing, as some may find it overwhelming. The emotional impact is likely to vary greatly between individuals. Such consultations must take place in sufficient time before the hearing goes ahead. Parties should allow for at least 48 hours in order for the judge to make a decision and set up the hearing.

 

In the case of hearings conducted using video software, the appropriate links must be sent in good time. Sending the link very close to the hearing creates additional stress and may mean that the victim enters the hearing in the wrong state of mind, uneasy and unable to concentrate.

 

In terms of links to video hearings and telephone lines it is vital that the victim and the perpetrator should never be the only two people present. Neither should the victim be left alone with the perpetrator and the perpetrator’s lawyer. This could potentially cause the victim huge distress.

 

Emails and correspondence

 

Within the guidance it specifies that emails sent to multiple participants, including lay participants, should always be sent as bcc rather than open cc for the safety of advocates as well as parties. Likewise, emails sent to multiple participants should never include a party’s or their lawyer’s mobile phone number.

 

 

Special measures to preserve privacy

 

When it comes to video conferences, some victims may find the experience worrying or invasive. They may believe that their location could be given away, putting them in danger. The perpetrator may take screenshots, or note down any details of the location of their victim given away by the video call. These are all possibilities that must be taken into consideration.

 

In order to combat this, the guidance states the following:

 

  • The court should provide information on how participants can blur their background or use a generic background if the platform being used enables this. If the platform does not enable this, the court should give advice about how to make the background as generic as possible.

 

  • Both the victim and the perpetrator should have the option to join via audio only, even if the other is joining by video. If it is necessary for the court to see the perpetrator (e.g. while giving evidence), the victim should be given advice as to how to cover their screen to avoid having to see the perpetrator themselves.

 

  • There may also be certain circumstances where the victim need not attend, for example where no evidence is due to be given and they have a legal representative acting on their behalf.

 

The full guidance can be found here: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Safety-from-Domestic-Abuse-and-Special-Measures-in-Remote-and-Hybrid-Hearings-Family-Justice-Council-guidance.pdf

 

Our thoughts on the guidance

 

We believe this guidance serves a highly important purpose in the world we currently find ourselves living in. Victims of domestic abuse should be given every opportunity to avoid further distress and the courtroom, or video hearing, should be no exception to that. Furthermore, the guidance does well in terms of covering many different possible emotional hurdles for the victim to overcome during these hearings. With the options available, if followed correctly and in a manner bespoke to each individual, this potentially painful event has a chance of being managed appropriately.

 

 

Support for victims of domestic abuse

 

Call Refuge’s National Domestic Abuse Helpline for free and confidential advice, 24 hours a day on 0808 2000 247. Visit the helpline website to access further information, a contact form and the live chat service. If you are in immediate danger, call 999 and ask for the police.

 

Translated guidance:

 

If English is not your first language you may find our translated guidance or easy read version useful. Women’s Aid also have guidance documents on domestic abuse and coronavirus available in a number of languages for victims, family and friends, and community members of those affected.

 

We are here to help!

 

If you are in an emergency, call 999 immediately and ask for the police. We will help you along the way to get a Domestic Violence Protection Notice or Domestic Violence Protection Order for immediate protection.

 

You can be granted settlement in the UK if you are the victim of domestic violence. We will guide you on how to obtain evidence and make an application to the Home Office.

 

Want to leave home for a safe place? We can help you access a refuge place, or make an emergency Homeless Application to your local authority.

 

Want to stay at home safely? We can help you obtain Injunctions (Non-molestation Order or Occupation Order) from the court to guarantee your safety to live at home.

 

Received threats from your partner regarding children? We will guide you on how to obtain evidence and make child arrangement orders to the court if necessary.

 

Want to file for divorce? We have divorce lawyers in place.

 

You are not the victim but suspect your family member or friend might be? We will let you know how you can use your ‘Right to Ask’ under ‘Clare’s Law’ by asking the police to make enquiries into the partner of a close friend or family member.

 

For more information on how we can help, see our article: Coronavirus can be kept outside – but for some the devil lives at home!

 

Have questions? We are here for you!

 

In the meantime, we are operating as usual, and you can reach us on 020 7928 0276 or email in to info@lisaslaw.co.uk for any questions you may have on this topic.

 

Or, why not download our free app today? You can launch a new enquiry, scan over documents and much more.

 

If you have an iPhone, follow this link to download.

 

If you use an Android phone, follow this link to download. 

 

Find the link here if you need some further instructions on how to use our new app!

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

First things first, what does HMO mean?

 

The concept of HMO was introduced by the Housing Act 2004. To put it simply, under section 254 of the Act, it refers to a building or part of a building or such building consisting of self-contained flats where:

 

  • its living accommodation is occupied by persons as their main or only residence;

 

  • these persons come from more than one household;

 

  • they share one or more basic amenities in the building; and

 

  • at least one of these persons is requested to pay rent or other consideration for occupying the living accommodation.

 

From 6th April 2006, all HMOs in England and Wales which are occupied by 5 or more persons are called large HMOs. They have to be licenced by the local authorities.

 

Important Changes

 

Prior to 1st October 2018, , the case was that a licensable house in multiple occupation (HMO) had to  be a property made up of three or more storeys, occupied by five or more persons in two or more households pursuant to the Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation.

 

However, The Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation (Prescribed Description) (England) Order 2018 (‘the 2018 Order’) has brought fundamental change to the above law from 1 October 2018. It provides an HMO in England was licensable if it was occupied by five or more persons living in two or more households. There is no longer the requirement for three or more storeys.

 

This essentially means that now all buildings have the possibility of becoming HMO’s, if they can meet the requirements. This is of massive significance to the entire housing structure in the UK.

 

HMO and the law

 

To ensure the welfare of both tenants and landlords within a HMO setting, there are some legal restrictions in place.

 

If you want to rent out your property as a house in multiple occupation in England or Wales you must contact your council to check if you need a licence. This is a vital part of the legalities of a HMO.

 

It is not only large properties that require a license. Even if your property is smaller and rented to fewer people, you may still need a licence depending on the area. We advise you check with your local council.

 

A licence is valid for a maximum of 5 years and needs to be renewed before it expires. If you were to run multiple HMO’s, you would need separate licences for each of them. One licensed does not cover multiple properties.

 

Also, HMO’s are not limited to properties let by secured shorthold tenancy. It applies in the case of lodgers as well. If you have a house and a family of four, you then allow a single lodger in the loft, spare room or basement, you will need to apply for a HMO.

 

Safety is paramount!

 

Getting a licence depends on many factors, a major one being if the property is fit and safe to be a HMO.

 

Conditions include that:

 

  • the house is suitable for the number of occupants (this depends on its size and facilities)

 

  • the manager of the house – you or an agent – is considered to be ‘fit and proper’, for example they have no criminal record or breach of landlord laws or code of practice

 

It is also important to:

 

  • send the council an updated gas safety certificate every year

 

  • install and maintain smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors

 

  • provide safety certificates for all electrical appliances when requested

 

  • achieve a minimum rating of E on the Energy Performance Certificate (EPC)

 

Essentially, the main concern is that people would be able to reasonably live in the property without being in danger.

 

It is also important to remember that extra conditions may be added before you receive your licence. You may be asked to improve the conditions of your facilities if they are deemed to be unfit for a HMO, or if there is evidence of rodents. Other possible problems may be any sign of dampness, a lack of ventilation or improper drainage.

 

Room sizes must be considered

 

Along with the above safety measures, room sizes must be taken into account in order to run a legal HMO. For example, you are obliged to notify the local housing authority of any room in the property with a floor area of less than 4.64 square metres as this is the smallest size allowed for a single child under the age of 10 to sleep in. Any smaller and such a room is not deemed fit for anyone to sleep in, regardless of age.

 

Any room within the HMO used as sleeping accommodation by one person who is aged 10 years or older is not permitted to be less than 6.51 square metres. Likewise, if a room is sleeping 2 people aged 10 or over the limit is no less than 10.22 square metres.

 

These rules are in place to ensure there is no overcrowding which could lead to distressing situations for the tenants.

 

 

Consequences of breaking the rules?

 

The consequences are to be taken very seriously, as the landlord will likely have their HMO license revoked and could face an unlimited fine and/or prosecution. The local housing authority may impose a financial penalty of up to £30,000 as an alternative to prosecution.

 

In addition, tenants can also sue landlords for repayment of their rent as a separate cause of action.

 

Rent repayments – a new normal?

 

When it comes to rent repayments, there have been some significant alterations to the rules as well, of specific concern to HMO landlords.

 

The previous position when making a rent repayment order was that landlords should not be ordered to pay more than the profit they would have gained from the renting. This was based on the common law principle where parties should be reversed to the positions where they would be in if the rental contract had not been entered into in the first place.

 

However, the current position is that landlords should be required to pay back all the rent paid and received as a starting point, irrespective of whether they have incurred expenses relating to the rental contract.

 

A case study

 

Let’s examine the case of Chan v Bilkhu and another. In this case the tenant, Chan, was requesting for the full refund of his rent after discovering that his landlord had not been officially licenced as a HMO landlord under the latest requirements.

 

Chan therefore commenced proceedings at the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) seeking a Rent Repayment Order (RRO). The FTT found that throughout the 12 months of the tenancy, the property had been an HMO which required to be licensed but it had not been licensed, meaning the landlord had indeed committed an offence.

 

The FTT found that Chan had paid £4,482.50 in rent during the 12 months of his tenancy. Based on these findings, the FTT made an RRO in the sum of £1,494.17 which it said represented one-third of the rental profit.

 

The FTT held that any money the landlord spent in the lead-up to the contract, such as advertising the room, or fitting some new appliances would be taken into account and should be deducted from the RRO.

 

Chan did not find it agreeable that the landlord should be allowed to deduct any expenses incurred relating to the rent. He maintained that the full rent should be refunded. He appealed.

 

At the Appeal Tribunal, it was held that the FTT judge made an error in law in that the correct position should be that the landlord should be ordered to repay the full rent, rather the profit. Consequently, the FTT’s initial order was set to one side as the case went further.

 

It was also found that until 1 October 2018, equating to one quarter of the tenancy, the house had not been a licensable HMO, as it was only on two storeys and not the qualifying three. Only when the regulations changed on 1 October, had it become licensable.

 

Therefore, the rent to be repaid to Chan by the landlord was eventually three-quarters of the rent for the year, which amounted to £3,361.87.

 

The above case can be clearly illustrated by the following example:

 

A tenant paid £1,000 to the landlord as part of a rental contract. During the same period of time, the landlord paid £50 buy-to-let mortgage interest (attributable to the accommodation concerned), paid another £150 to market the accommodation and find the tenant; and paid £50 to a plumber who came and repaired boiler in the accommodation. The landlord is deemed to have made a profit of £750 from the renting.

 

Under the old regime, the tribunal can only order him to refund to the tenant £750 at the maximum; while under the new regime, he can be ordered to refund the full £1,000.

 

This is clearly worth taking into consideration and acts as another reason as to why it is so important to keep up to date with the new rules as a landlord.

 

 

Our comments

 

It is quite concerning that although the market of HMOs has been regulated since 6th April 2006 and in England, such regulation has become stricter, many landlords are still not aware of it, or pay sufficient attention to it even if they are aware of it. This will potentially put them in a very dangerous and risky position.

 

We predict that much more litigation will arise from this area of law.  Many landlords are likely to be prosecuted by the local authorities which could lead to civil penalties and/or convictions.

 

Further, this could become another area of minefield of claims for rent repayment by tenants against landlords, as what is happening in the area of rent deposit protection scheme. Many landlords are unaware that they may face rent repayment claims from their tenants and lodgers, which could go back as far as 2014, if not 6th April 2006 when the HMO was first introduced, if we are to take statutory limitation into consideration.

 

We are planning a live webinar on this subject in the near future, so keep your eyes peeled for more details on when this will be!

 

Have questions? We are here for you!

 

In the meantime, we are operating as usual, and you can reach us on 020 7928 0276 or email in to info@lisaslaw.co.uk for any questions you may have on this topic.

 

Or, why not download our free app today? You can launch a new enquiry, scan over documents and much more.

 

If you have an iPhone, follow this link to download.

 

If you use an Android phone, follow this link to download. 

 

Find the link here if you need some further instructions on how to use our new app!

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

Written by Rosa Huang.

 

 

England has been plunged into its second lockdown for a four-week period beginning from last week, but work of the courts and tribunals will continue to be exempted from lockdown measures. The exemption will help to avoid any substantial delays from the lockdown, given that the backlog of cases has already increased significantly in the past six months.

 

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has brought great challenges to the business entities. In response to this, there should be careful consideration of how the substantive law applies in this novel situation.

 

In April 2020, the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (“BIICL”) hosted a meeting attended by academics and senior judges, including Lord Neuberger, the former President of the UK Supreme Court. The “Breathing Space” guidelines arose out of this meeting.

 

The “Breathing Space” guidelines

 

The guidelines comprises of a series of concept notes examining the effect of the COVID-19 on commercial contracts. It provides guidelines on how the legal and business communities shall respond to the pandemic in order to foster economic recovery.

 

Concept Note 1 expressed a concern that strict reliance by parties on their legal rights in response to this pandemic may lead to a “deluge of litigation and arbitration” which would overwhelm the courts, disrupt supply chains and potentially stunt economic recovery.  It suggested that the solution may lie partly at a private law level.

 

Concept Note 2 looked more closely at the private law response to the pandemic, specifically in the context of contractual disputes, and how existing legal principles may be applied in the context of COVID-19 related disputes, as well as how existing dispute resolution mechanisms may effectively be used to achieve negotiated solutions.

 

The recently published Concept Note 3 proposes a set of practical guidelines (“the Guidelines”) which might be adopted by parties to contractual disputes to encourage a more conciliatory approach, without prejudicing or altering their legal rights.

 

 

The Guidelines

 

The Guidelines comprises three sections:

 

  1. Interactions between contractual parties – it encourages all parties to:

 

  • act fairly and responsibly to maintain contractual performance;

 

  • adopt a mutual, without prejudice and confidential ‘cards on the table’ approach to information sharing relevant to the continued performance under the contract;

 

  • discuss possible solutions for problems. The solutions can be extensions or reductions of time for performance and/or payment, non-contractual remedies, increases or reductions in the scope of the contract and re-negotiation (including with the involvement of a third-party facilitator);

 

  • explore ways to balance the impact between all parties, where extensions or reductions of time and/or changes in scope and/or price are sought; and

 

  • where an early resolution cannot be achieved, explore whether the dispute can be ring-fenced to allow contractual performance to otherwise be maintained.

 

 

  1. Dispute Resolution – it encourages all parties to:

 

  • before resorting to proceedings, and where resources are available, appoint the most appropriate party representatives on all sides to encourage an objective assessment of the dispute and bring different perspectives to its resolution;

 

  • agree extensions to contractual or statutory limitation periods where to do otherwise would likely result in proceedings having to be issued;

 

  • avoid adopting tactical practices intended to place other parties under unreasonable financial or time pressure; and

 

  • where a party seeks funding in relation to proceedings, invite any litigation funder to follow the Guidelines.

 

 

  1. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and Legal Proceedings – it encourages all parties to:

 

  • use various ADR techniques to with a view to avoiding legal proceedings or narrowing the issues in dispute (whilst recognising that emergency interim relief may be necessary as a last resort before pre-action ADR has been exhausted); and

 

  • where legal proceedings s are unavoidable, work together to adopt litigation/arbitration procedures and timetables aimed at managing the proceedings in an efficient and time-appropriate manner;

 

  • use ADR techniques alongside the proceedings with a continued view to resolving or narrowing the issues in dispute; and

 

  • consider whether issues arising in the dispute are of wider significance or commonly occurring, such that a court or tribunal may make determinations of wider application through available procedural mechanisms, including a stay in proceedings pending the determination of other cases involving common issues of fact or law, consolidation with other proceedings, or determination of specific issues of precedent value to the parties.

 

 

Comment

 

The Guidelines, although not mandatory, serve as helpful recommendations on the behaviour of the contractual parities, and the steps parties should be taking before embarking on formal legal proceedings. In particular, ADR is further encouraged.

 

By using ADR techniques to avoid legal proceedings or narrow the issues in dispute, the parties are likely to save time and money as they are likely to be able to obtain a resolution much quicker than they would by going through the Courts.

 

Under the UK law, the courts also have duties to further the overriding objective by encouraging the parties to co-operate with each other in the conduct of the proceedings and to use ADR procedure if the court considers that appropriate, and facilitating the use of such procedure.

 

The courts encourage exploration of ADR through reminding, staying proceedings and orders for costs.  Where appropriate, courts also provide access to ‘early neutral evaluation’, or ENE. In Lomax v. Lomax, [2019], the English Court of Appeal has held that a judge can refer the parties to ADR even in absence of one or both parties’ consent.

 

In light of the above, before issuing proceedings, we would suggest the following:

 

The starting point is to review contract documentation to check the relevant requirements. Where the contracts contain provisions that disputes must be referred to a particular form of ADR, the parties certainly should follow these provisions; where there are no such provisions in the contract, all parties should engage in at least one form of ADR, as required under the Guidelines.

 

Have questions? We are here for you!

 

If you are encountering difficulties with your contractual relationships and would like advice on your legal position, or guidance on formulating an effective strategy for disputes, please feel free to contact us by phone on 020 7928 0276, or email into info@lisaslaw.co.uk.

 

Or, why not download our free app today? You can launch a new enquiry, scan over documents and much more.

 

If you have an iPhone, follow this link to download.

 

If you use an Android phone, follow this link to download. 

 

Find the link here if you need some further instructions on how to use our new app!

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

In relation to family litigation regarding children’s custody, the general position is that the child’s usual residence should not be changed unless in exceptional circumstances. When considering the issue of usual residence, the Court will consider how long the residence has lasted and how well the child has settled down into the surroundings including schooling, socialising with friends and relationship with other family members. When dealing with such cases, the child’s best interest should always be the Court’s primary concern. If one party wants to relocate the child, he/she will have to prove that such relocation is in the best interest of the child and that there is sufficient education and care arrangement in place.

 

Such principle was once again confirmed by the Court in the case Re: A (A Child) (Relocation) {2020}, which can be found at the following link: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2020/2878.html

 

What was the case about?

 

The facts of the case can be summarised as follows:

 

The child, who we will refer to as ‘A’, is 2 years old and the only child of a British Algerian father and a Slovakian mother. The parents separated and the mother wished to return to Slovakia and take A with her. The father objected and wanted A to stay with him in England.

 

The mother claimed that the father was abusive towards her, however the father denied such claims. In fact, he claimed that the mother had been abusive towards him.

 

The father also claimed that the mother had wrongfully kept A in Slovakia back in 2019. The father applied for an order for her summary return and he obtained a without notice passport order, which was served on the mother during a mediation session in England in November. Shortly afterwards, the maternal grandmother brought A to England.

 

 

So, how did the Court decide the issues?

 

The father’s claims that the mother was aggressive and a danger to A were found to be untrue. Also, aggressive messages and photographic evidence of violence towards the mother were found on a phone, which gave the judge reason to believe that the mother was telling the truth while the father was not. It was decided that that father was more of a danger to A, as the mother has said.

 

What’s more, evidence suggested that the mother was the primary caregiver to A and that a strong bond had developed between them. The mother took care of A’s emotional and physical needs.

 

The issues that the mother were facing stemmed from the fathers control over her, and her financial insecurity which is part of the control. In Slovakia she would be with her parents, in the town where she grew up, with suitable accommodation provided at no charge to her. It would be a much more appropriate environment for A to grow up in, and the move would also help the mother be a better role model and caregiver to A.

 

When considering the Human Rights of the parents it was found that the relocation would involve a disproportionate interference with the rights of either parent under art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The father would be allowed contact with the child, frequent video contact was deemed beneficial to A. The father’s Muslim roots were also considered, and A has the right to learn about her heritage, so contact with the father is still permitted.

 

Conclusion:

 

After hearing evidence from both parties, the Court granted the mother’s application and allow the child to permanently live with her in Slovakia. The Court based its judgment on its findings that the father was abuse towards the mother and that the child’s best interest could be harmed if the father was allowed to have the child’s custody.

 

In this case, the child was a British citizen, born and currently living in the UK. Her usual residence should be England. In normal circumstances, the mother will not be allowed to take the child outside the UK. However, the mother had successfully proved that not only she had made sufficient care and education arrangement for the child in Slovakia, but also it would be harmful to the child to stay in the UK with the father.

 

The outcome might have been different, should the mother only be able to prove either of the above and not both.

 

Have questions? We are here for you!

 

In the meantime, we are operating as usual, and you can reach us on 020 7928 0276 or email in to info@lisaslaw.co.uk for any questions you may have on this topic.

 

Or, why not download our free app today? You can launch a new enquiry, scan over documents and much more.

 

If you have an iPhone, follow this link to download.

 

If you use an Android phone, follow this link to download. 

 

Find the link here if you need some further instructions on how to use our new app!

 

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

The Immigration Skills Charge (Amendment) Regulations 2020 passed both houses of the Parliament on 3rd November 2020. It is to amend the Immigration Skills Charge Regulations 2017.

 

What is the immigration skills charge?

 

First thing first, immigration skills charge is levy paid by employers who hire foreign workers to the government.

 

Employers must pay this if they are applying for a visa to work in the UK for 6 months or more under either a:

 

  • Tier 2 (General) visa

 

  • Tier 2 (Intra-company Transfer) visa

 

If the worker has applied for their visa from within the UK, the employer must pay the charge even if they’re applying for less than 6 months.

 

So what has changed?

 

Amendments made by the 2020 Regulations include the definition of skilled worker and add exemptions to the requirement to pay the charge. These Regulations come into force on 1 December 2020.

 

Definition of a skilled worker:

 

The amendment defines a person as a skilled worker as follows:

 

“skilled worker” means an individual who, in order to undertake employment, seeks entry clearance or leave to remain via an immigration route that—

 

(a) requires the individual’s role to be skilled appropriately in accordance with the immigration rules;

 

(b) requires the individual’s remuneration to meet or exceed a minimum threshold in accordance with the immigration rules;

 

(c) requires the individual to be sponsored in accordance with the immigration rules; and

 

(d) permits workers applying under that route to obtain a visa for a time period greater than 2 years.”

 

Exemptions from the charge:

 

The obligation to pay the charge does not apply where a sponsor assigns a certificate of sponsorship to a skilled worker under the following catchments (the last 3 in bold have been added within the recent amendment):

 

(i)     2111 (chemical scientists);

 

(ii)     2112 (biological scientists and biochemists);

 

(iii)     2113 (physical scientists);

 

(iv)     2114 (social and humanities scientists);

 

(v)     2119 (natural and social science professionals not elsewhere classified);

 

(vi)     2150 (research and development managers);

 

(vii)     2311 (higher education teaching professionals);

 

(viii)   2444 (clergy);

 

(ix)     3441 (sports players);

 

(x)      3442 (sports coaches, instructors and officials);.

 

 

Refunds on the Immigration Skill Charge

 

Employers can apply for a full refund if the worker’s visa application is:

 

  • refused or withdrawn

 

  • successful, but they do not come to work for you

 

They can get a partial refund if the worker:

 

  • gets less time on their visa than you sponsored them for

 

  • starts working for you but then changes to another sponsor

 

  • leaves their job before the end date on their certificate of sponsorship

 

How long it takes

 

Employers usually get a refund within 90 days of:

 

  • telling UKVI that the worker did not come to work for you

 

  • the expiration date on the worker’s certificate of sponsorship, if they did not use it to apply for a visa

 

  • the date the worker’s visa application is refused or withdrawn

 

If the worker’s visa application is refused, the employer can ask for the decision to be reviewed. This is known as an ‘administrative review’.

 

If they do not ask for an administrative review, the employer can get a refund within 90 days of the deadline for applying for one.

 

The employer will get a refund within 90 days of the administrative review being dismissed if the worker applied for one and were unsuccessful.

 

Have questions? We are here for you!

 

In the meantime, we are operating as usual, and you can reach us on 020 7928 0276 or email in to info@lisaslaw.co.uk for any questions you may have on this topic.

 

Or, why not download our free app today? You can launch a new enquiry, scan over documents and much more.

 

If you have an iPhone, follow this link to download.

 

If you use an Android phone, follow this link to download. 

 

Find the link here if you need some further instructions on how to use our new app!

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

The second UK-wide lockdown begins tomorrow, bringing with it a fresh wave of anxiety. A large part of peoples worry will be based on their employment and how the new rules will affect their income. The furlough scheme kept many heads above water during the first lockdown back in March 2020 and with the scheme now being extended until March 2021, we thought we would clarify who is actually entitled to go back on the scheme and how they might find it different this time around.

 

Furlough scheme in a nutshell

As you will remember, the scheme was brought in to prevent massive amounts of redundancies and to ensure people were still getting financial income during lockdown, which has not changed. Employees placed on the scheme receive 80% of their wages, with the maximum amount one person able to receive being £2,500 per month.

 

The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (the official name of the furlough scheme), was due to end from November and be replaced by a slightly different one known as the Job Support Scheme, but this has been postponed in line with the second lockdown. The furlough scheme will now run until March 2021, giving people some extra breathing space through these tough times.

 

What employers are allowed to put staff on furlough?

 

Most employers are eligible for the scheme, even if the business they run is small. Charities can also put employers on furlough, as can recruitment agencies. The main concern is that the employer must have a PAYE payroll scheme and a UK bank account.

 

It does not matter if employers have been on the furlough scheme before or not, they are entitled to be put back on it if the employer meets the requirements.

 

Employers can claim for employees on any type of employment contract, including full-time, part-time, agency, flexible or zero-hour contracts. Foreign nationals are also eligible to be furloughed.

 

 

How will it be different?

 

As far as employees go, they should not find any differences between this second furlough and the first one. They should still see 80% of their pay going into their accounts each month. For employers the situation is also looking familiar. During the first lockdown, the government paid 80% of the salary amounting to a maximum of £2,500 per month, plus any associated NI contributions and employers had choice to decide whether to top up the remaining 20% or not, ultimately giving the employee their full wage. The only difference is that employers will be asked to cover National Insurance and employer pension contributions – which averagely accounts for just 5% of total employment costs during the second lockdown.

 

Keeping employee rights

 

Employees still have the same rights at work, including:

 

  • Statutory Sick Pay

 

  • annual leave

 

  • maternity and other parental rights

 

  • rights against unfair dismissal

 

  • redundancy payments

 

Employers can continue to claim for a furloughed employee who is serving a statutory notice period, however grants cannot be used to substitute redundancy payments. HMRC will continue to monitor businesses after the scheme has closed.

 

 

What employees can and cannot do while on furlough

 

During working hours furloughed employees cannot be asked to do any work for the employer that:

 

  • makes money for the organisation or any organisation linked or associated with the employers’ organisation

 

  • provides services for the employers’ organisation or any organisation linked or associated with the organisation

 

The employee is allowed to:

 

  • take part in training

 

  • volunteer for another employer or organisation

 

  • work for another employer (if contractually allowed)

 

Other support available for businesses

 

As well as the furlough scheme, certain businesses may also qualify for the below:

 

  • Up to £3,000 per month could be given under the Local Restrictions Support Grant if their workplace is forced to close

 

  • £1,000 awarded for every furloughed employee that retains their job until at least the end of January

 

  • £1,500 for every unemployed young person (16-24 year-old) given certain six-month work placements

 

What do we think?

 

As a business ourselves, we understand that employee well-being is absolutely key. We support the furlough scheme and believe that if employers are happy to put their workers on it, they should go right ahead. It is a safety net that should not be taken for granted, and while the money paid out will certainly have a detrimental effect on the economy, the alternative of people going without any money is far worse.

 

 

Have questions? We are here for you!

 

In the meantime, we are operating as usual, and you can reach us on 020 7928 0276 or email in to info@lisaslaw.co.uk for any questions you may have on this topic.

 

Or, why not download our free app today? You can launch a new enquiry, scan over documents and much more.

 

If you have an iPhone, follow this link to download.

 

If you use an Android phone, follow this link to download. 

 

Find the link here if you need some further instructions on how to use our new app!

 

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

As we are sure you all know, the UK’s second lockdown will start on Thursday the 5th of November and will last for 4 weeks.

 

We are writing this to let everyone know that we will remain open throughout the entirety of this lockdown and will be able to provide the same high quality service as usual. Our team of highly knowledgeable solicitors have been successfully working from home for many months now, and although we welcomed a return to the office when the first lockdown was lifted, we are more than prepared for the second one.

 

It is very much business at usual here at Lisa’s Law in all of our practice areas, especially as the housing market is still able to proceed and the courts remain open throughout the second lockdown. You can rest assured our legal service will not be affected!

 

How to contact us

 

  • Call us on 020 7928 0276, phone calls are operating as usual and will be taking calls from 9:30am to 6:00pm.

 

  • Email us on info@lisaslaw.co.uk, or email your personal caseworker as. Our caseworkers are tending to their cases with the same professionalism and efficiency as always.

 

 

Join over 1000 people currently using our app!

 

Why would you risk leaving the house when you can instruct a solicitor from the comfort of your living room? Download our brand new app today, and instruct us from the safety of your own home, while enjoying a nice cup of tea!

 

You can launch a new enquiry, scan over documents, check the progress of your case and much more. It is 100% free to download, easy to use and is available on both Android and iPhone devices.

 

 

Links to download below:

 

iPhone:

 

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisas-law/id1503174541?ls=1

 

Android:

 

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lisaslaw

 

For more instructions regarding our app, you can follow this link.

 

We are always here for our clients!

 

We understand that this year has been tough, and filled with many new challenges. In spite of the hardships 2020 has served up, we will always be here for our clients, old and new. Lisa’s Law has adapted to the new demands of the Coronavirus guidelines to ensure we can operate as effectively as ever. With our online developments, Ask Lisa and our mobile app, we can provide our clients with a legal service we know they will be satisfied with.

 

We are here for you anytime, anywhere!

 

Thank you,

 

Lisa’s Law Solicitors.

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

Getting the approval for a mortgage on a property is a very tough thing to do for most people, especially in the current climate we find ourselves in. Often, a long time has been spent filling out forms and going over options with lenders and other professionals, not to  mention saving up the money needed for a deposit.

 

What is money laundering?

 

To give a brief summary, money laundering is the illegal process of concealing the origins of money obtained via illegal means. This is often done by passing the funds through a complex sequence of banking transfers or commercial transactions. The overall objective of this is to “clean” the money, as the illegal cash will be mixed in with regular money. In this way, the launderer can recoup their funds with legitimate money, while disassociating themselves with the “dirty” money.

 

How does this tie in to mortgages?

 

There are quite a few ways a mortgage can be used as means of laundering money. One way is by using laundered money as a deposit. Alternatively, money launderers can locate a lender to complete a buy-to-let mortgage, and then launder money through the revenue generated by rent instalments.

 

As an honest person looking into mortgage options, however, how should you avoid being suspected of mortgage fraud, and potentially damaging your application? Read on to find out.

 

Personal savings

 

This is the most common way people put down a deposit and will usually be accepted by most mortgage lenders without many questions. It still needs to be verified that the money has come from a legitimate source.

 

Depending on the amount of your savings, lenders may want you to provide bank statements for the past 6 months or even longer period of time. If there is any large lump sum deposit, it is always advisable to provide evidence to prove the original source of the money.

 

It is also good practice to have payslips ready to be inspected, so that your income can me verified.

 

Also, for salaried staff, lenders sometimes carry out a background check against the employer to satisfy themselves that the employer does have the capability to pay the staff.

 

Inheritance

 

If your deposit is inherited by you from your family members, relatives or friends, you clearly will need the relevant probate documentation at hand, like copy of the will, solicitors’ confirmation, so that lenders can verify your account.

 

Gifts from family or friends

 

With the property ladder becoming more and more unreachable to first-time buyers, more people are resorting to family members and friends’ support. This is normally made by way of gifts in the form of cash towards your deposit. This is clearly a wonderful and kind gesture, but there are a few things that you must take into account.

 

Firstly, it is understandable that a large sum of money being transferred into your account out of the blue will look suspicious. Money lenders and solicitors will always question where these types of transfers have come from. If you fail to provide a good answer, a money laundering investigation may be launched which will affect your mortgage application.

 

What you have to do is provide evidence that this money has come from a legitimate source, and was given to you freely. Evidence usually comes in the form of a signed letter from the person gifting you the money, stating that it is not a loan which will need to be repaid, but rather a one off gift. It should also state that this money does not entitle the person providing it any share of the property which it is going towards paying for. Your mortgage adviser can provide you with a document template if you are unsure, as can we here at Lisa’s Law.

 

Lottery and Compensation award from the Court

 

If you are lucky enough to have won a lottery or are an innocent party and have been awarded compensation from Court proceedings, you will need the relevant paperwork to prove the source of the lump sum payments. These evidence can be any payment receipt or confirmation from the lottery authority, Court judgment or relevant proceeding papers.

 

Using a Credit card?

 

You will have no problem of proving the legitimate source of the funds. However, it should be noted that any funds from your credit card is in fact debt owed by you to the credit card issuer. It is unlikely that your lender will accept it as your deposit.

 

In the meantime, credit cards are frequently used by fraudsters to commit crimes. Common types of credit fraud involve lost or stolen credit cards being used without the owner’s permission or knowledge, stealing credit card details and committing fraudulent applications using someone else’s identity.

 

Therefore, our advice is: if possible, avoid them.

 

Still living in the shadow of your ex?

 

Your ex can have a longer affect in your life than you may have realised, even after you both have signed a clear-cut agreement drafted by your solicitors. You may have opened various accounts and signed agreements jointly in the past.

 

They can be credit card accounts, utilities accounts, entertainment accounts or even other junk accounts, which you have never used or accessed for ages and completely forgot about them.

 

Being linked with an ex-partner means that their spending, credit record and the way they use those accounts can potentially affect your credit rating, in particular, if they are not careful with their money and have had judgments against them.

 

If you believe you may still be linked to an ex-partner in relation to the above accounts, you need to immediately de-link yourself from her/him by checking whether you can close those accounts, removing yourself from them or put limit on those accounts. You should also contact credit reference agencies and explain the situation to them if needed.

 

Register to the electoral roll

 

This essentially means you are registered to vote. Mortgage lenders must be able to verify your identity for purposes of anti-money laundering. If you are registered on the electoral roll, they will be able to see that you are really who you claim to be as it enables lenders to check your information, confirm your name, address and residential history.

 

Although it is not necessarily the case that your mortgage application will be denied if you are not on the electoral roll, it will clearly be a bonus if you can put yourself on the register.

 

What if you are self-employed?

 

Self-employed people may have a few extra hoops to jump through when securing a mortgage because their income may vary from month to month. This makes them less reliable in the eyes of mortgage lenders. What if one month they cannot make a payment due to their business falling short? You can understand their concern.

 

Lenders will see you as self-employed if you own more than 20% to 25% of a business, which provides your main source of income. You could be a sole trader, company director, or contractor.

 

Proving your income as a self-employed person:

 

To prove your income when you apply for a self-employed mortgage, you will need to provide:

 

  • At least 2 years’ certified accounts

 

  • SA302 forms / tax year overview (from HMRC) for the past two or three years

 

  • Evidence of contracts which are upcoming (if you are a contractor)

 

  • Proof of dividend payments or retained profits (in the case of a company director)

 

For self-employed running business as a limited company, the lender will request for full annual accounts or CT600 or both. The lender will also look at the actual salary or dividend the applicant has drawn from the company together with the profit retained within the company.

 

 

Have questions? We are here for you!

 

In the meantime, we are operating as usual, and you can reach us on 020 7928 0276 or email in to info@lisaslaw.co.uk for any questions you may have on this topic.

 

Or, why not download our free app today? You can launch a new enquiry, scan over documents and much more.

 

If you have an iPhone, follow this link to download.

 

If you use an Android phone, follow this link to download. 

 

Find the link here if you need some further instructions on how to use our new app!

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

The most recent changes to the Immigration Rules, according to the Home Office, aim to continue the government’s commitment to ‘simplifying the rules’ while also bringing in the Future Points-Based Immigration System.

 

This blog post aims to highlight the key parts of these new changes. For the full guidance you can follow this link.

 

Taking effect:

 

It is good to be aware that parts of this guidance have been released already, but this new statement fully solidifies previous ones.

 

Some key dates within this guidance us as follows:

 

Much of the new guidance will take effect from 9am on 1 December 2020, however, if an application for entry clearance, leave to enter or leave to remain has been made before 9am on 1 December 2020, the application will be decided in accordance with the Immigration Rules in force on 30 November 2020.

 

Parts of this guidance coming in from 9am on 1 December 2020 includes Skilled Worker visa rules, Global Talent visa, and Representative of Overseas Business visa.

 

The following changes take effect at 11pm on 31 December 2020: Leave to Remain, Settlement applications, and Family permits.

 

The changes around Hong Kong British National (Overseas) takes effect on 31 January 2021.

 

Visitor rules:

 

The Visitor rules will now:

 

  • permit study of up to six months under the standard visit route. All study must be undertaken at an accredited institution, except recreational courses undertaken for leisure that last no longer than 30 days;

 

  • allow drivers on international routes to collect as well as deliver goods and passengers in and out of the UK;

 

  • remove the requirement for volunteering to be incidental to the main reason for the visit.

 

Other visitation rules to take note of are:

 

  • Permitted Paid Engagement visitor: for experts in their field coming to the UK to undertake specific paid engagements for up to one month.

 

  • Transit visitor: for those who want to transit the UK on route to another country outside the Common Travel Area and who will enter the UK for up to 48 hours by crossing the UK border unless Appendix Visitor: Transit Without Visa Scheme applies.

 

Short term study route:

 

A new Short-term Study route is being introduced for students who wish to come to the UK to study English language courses for between 6 and 11 months, replacing the current route. The study must be at an accredited institution. Students who wish to come to the UK to study for 6 months or less may now do so under the Visitor route.

 

Some notable changes here are:

 

  • Validity requirements for the online form must be completed, the fee and Immigration Health Charge paid, biometrics and passport or travel document to be provided, and that the applicant must be outside the UK and aged 16 or over at the date of application. An applicant who does not meet these requirements may have their application rejected rather than being considered and refused.

 

  • Applicants need to have either paid their course fees, or have sufficient funds to pay their fees.

 

  • The study that a Short-term Student can undertake must consist solely of English language study at an accredited institution. An accredited institution is one which has been independently assessed by a specified inspection body as meeting required educational standards. The student must intend to leave within 30 days of the completion of their English language course and have sufficient funds to support themselves in the UK. A successful applicant will be granted a visa for 11 months.

 

The Parent of a Child Student route:

 

The Parent of a Child Student route allows one parent to come to or stay in the UK to care for their child (or children), where the child is a Child Student aged between four and 11 who is attending an independent fee-paying school in the UK.

 

Similarly to the above, online forms must be completed and the Immigration Health Surcharge must be paid.

 

Applicants need to show that they have funds available to cover their stay in the UK at  £1,270 and £315 per month for both the parent and the child, if they are applying for entry clearance or who have been living in the UK for less than 12 months.

 

Skilled worker route:

 

The Skilled Worker route is a new points-based route for those who wish to come to the UK for the purpose of working in a skilled job they have been offered. The key characteristics of the new route are that an applicant must be sponsored to do a specific job, which meets skill and salary requirements, by an employer that has been licensed by the Home Office.

 

An application as a Skilled Worker must:

 

  • provide a certificate of sponsorship issued to them by their sponsor, dated no more than 3 months before the date of application (sponsor must be recognised as legitimate by the Home Office);

 

  • provide written consent to the application from any Government or international scholarship agency who awarded the applicant any award for study in the UK in the 12 months preceding the date of application as a Skilled Worker;

 

  • be aged 18 or over on the date of application.

 

Salary:

 

The general salary threshold set for Skilled Workers will be lowered from £30,000 under the Tier 2 (General) route to £25,600 a year. Sponsors must, as under Tier 2 (General) route, pay their skilled workers a salary which equals or exceeds both this threshold and the “going rate” for the occupation.

 

Sponsored workers may be paid less than the above amounts, depending on the tradeable points they are awarded. Applicants under the new route will need to be awarded 70 points in total.

 

All applicants must qualify for 50 mandatory points for:

 

  • Sponsorship (20 points).

 

  • A job at the appropriate skill level (20 points).

 

  • English language skills at B1 (intermediate) level (10 points).

 

An applicant may be awarded the remaining 20 tradeable points in one of the following ways:

 

– A salary which equals or exceeds both £25,600 per year and the going rate for the occupation (20 points).

 

– A PhD qualification which is relevant to the job (10 points), and a salary which equals or exceeds both £23,040 per year and 90% of the going rate for the occupation (10 points).

 

– A PhD qualification in a STEM subject which is relevant to the job, and a salary which equals or exceeds both £20,480 per year and 80% of the going rate for the occupation (20 points).

 

– A job in a shortage occupation, and a salary which equals or exceeds both £20,480 per year and 80% of the going rate for the occupation (20 points).

 

– Being a new entrant to the labour market, and a salary which equals or exceeds both £20,480 per year and 70% of the going rate for the occupation (20 points).

 

– A job in a listed health or education occupation, and a salary which equals or exceeds both £20,480 per year and 80% of the going rate for the occupation (20 points).

 

Intra-Company Transfer Route:

 

On the Intra-Company Transfer route changes are being made to remove the cooling off requirement, to a single salary threshold for high earners at £73,900, and to allow people to move onto the route when already in the UK.

 

Start-up and Innovator routes:

 

These routes were reformed recently to attract to the UK those with innovative business ideas, you can read about them in our recent article – Immigration Changes for EEA Nationals from Jan 2021 – What you need to know!

 

Essentially, the Start-up route is for those setting up a business for the first time, who need to work to support themselves while developing their business ideas. The Innovator route is for those with industry experience and at least £50,000 funding, who can dedicate their working time to their business ventures, or those moving from Start-up who are progressing their business.

 

Also, each applicant for Start-up and Innovator must have the support of an approved Endorsing Body.

 

What do we think?

 

These are just some important parts of the guidance that we believe will have the most far reaching effects on people. In terms of the guidance itself, it is clear and concise. In the past the guidance has been a lot vaguer in regards to certain immigration. We are not saying these rules are perfect or that we support them wholeheartedly, but we do feel that they at least have clarity and applicants will know where they stand.

 

There is no getting away from the fact that the end of free movement and the introduction of a Points-Based Immigration System marks a huge change for EU, EEA and Swiss citizens, as well as for the UK in general.

 

We want to remind readers that EU, EEA and Swiss citizens arriving in the UK on or before 31 December who wish to work, study or visit the UK should not apply through the Points-Based Immigration System. If they want to stay in the UK after 30 June 2021 they should apply to the EU Settlement Scheme upon arrival in the UK.

Commonwealth citizens can continue to apply for a UK Ancestry visa to live, work or study in the UK. We are here to help anyone who has questions about these options.

 

It is of vital importance that people get their applications to stay in the UK in to the Home Office as soon as possible, as the time will come where it is too late and the chance will have been missed.

 

Please do not hesitate to get in contact with us if you have any questions whatsoever, or if you’d like our help in completing your applications.

 

 

Have questions? We are here for you!

 

In the meantime, we are operating as usual, and you can reach us on 020 7928 0276 or email in to info@lisaslaw.co.uk for any questions you may have on this topic.

 

Or, why not download our free app today? You can launch a new enquiry, scan over documents and much more.

 

If you have an iPhone, follow this link to download.

 

If you use an Android phone, follow this link to download. 

 

Find the link here if you need some further instructions on how to use our new app!

 

 

author avatar
lisaslaw@web

Have a question? Our friendly and experienced team are here to help.

Subscribe to our newsletter

We post weekly articles covering a variety of topics, including immigration, property, and more, so subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates. 

Subscribe Newsletter Blog Sidebar

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Untitled(Required)